Innocent Texts Conspiring with Imperial Desire: A Critique of Nafisi’s Reading Lolita in Tehran

Keywords: Apparatus, native informant, revolution, stereotype, amplification

Abstract

Abstract Views: 257

'Native informant' acclaims the transmission of stereotypical representation of Muslim society as a general rule and women specifically. The present work provides a comprehensive prospect of women status defined by religion Islam to build consciousness globally. Through qualitative inquiry, the present study critically analyzes Nafisi's Reading Lolita in Tehran (2003). Iranian writer Azar Nafisi assumes the role of 'native informant' who amplifies the narrative to authenticate her account. The study employs 'amplification' as apparatus to scrutinize fundamentalist perspective of religion Islam reflected in Iranian fiction. Spivak's concept of 'native informant' is reproduced in the narratives to establish the narrator's role as a hybrid character whose thoughts regularly record and oppose the assumed fundamentalist obligations set by the Islamic regime. The narrative begins in the narrator's house, who ardently assembles her university students and discusses various classical literary works. The memoir recounts a woman's experience in Tehran before, during, and after the revolution. Names of characters are concealed to keep individuals safe from probable vengeance and degradation. Primarily, the study enquires how knowledge production through writing personal narratives runs into mainstream culture, characterizing the representation of stereotypes. Narratives inform about a specific culture and mirror the role of 'native informant' in amplifying fundamentals of native culture and religion. Nafisi's account of extensive cultural and religious judgments from context-specific attempts to extrapolate that Islamic Republic Iran vehemently formed a desperate unobtrusive region, which maltreated women. Nafisi may have a self-protective standpoint for women, but she emerged more like a "native informant" rather than a social reformer by amplifying the situation.

Keywords: Apparatus, native informant, revolution, stereotype, amplification

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, M. 2011. The Shah. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ahmed, N., Bashir, H., and Karima, Y. 2015. Status of women in Islam: A perspective, Global Islamic Economics Magazine43(1). Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2739329

Amy C. Alexander and Parhizkari, S. 2018.A multilevel study of gender egalitarian values across Muslim-majority provinces: the role of women and urban spaces.International Review of Sociology28(3):474-491.doi:10.1080/03906701.2018.1473124.

De-Vries, N. and 1998. Thamyris mythmaking from past to present. Najade Press: Amsterdam.

Eltahawy, M. 2015. www.butterfliesandwheels.org. Retrieved March 14, 2016.

Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts:thresholds of interpretation. Cambridge:Cambridge UniversityPress.

Genette, G. 1997. Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Hazbun, G. 2015. Narratives of the Islamic conquest from medieval Spain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jahangir, A.1991. Dynamics of the Iranian revolution. New York: State University of New York Press.

Joseph, S. 2005. Stereotypes: United States: Arab Muslim Women as portrayed in films. Encyclopedia of Women & Islamic Cultures.

Mahmood, S. 2012. www.huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved March 14, 2016.

Marks, M. 2012. www.huffingtonpost.com.Retrieved June 3, 2016.

Mehrdad, D. 2003. Islamic feminism: Compromise or challenge to feminism. Iran Bulletin. Retrieved June 3, 2016.https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/43677837/introduction-islam-and-

Muller, A. 2013. Adapting canonical texts in children’s literature,London:Bloomsbury.

Nafisi, A. 2003. Reading Lolita in Tehran. New York: Random House, Trade Paperbacks.

Ritter, D.2010. Why the Iranian Revolution was non-violent: Internalized social change and the iron cage of liberalism. Retrieved May 22, 2016.www.epositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/21097.

Spivak, G. 1999. A critique of postcolonialreason:Toward a history of the vanishing present. 357-9.Retrieved March 14, 2016www.metafish.wordpress.com.

Warren, S. 2018. Placing faith in creative labour: Muslim women and digital media work in Britain7(1): 1-9. Retrieved Dec 4, 2020https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.

Wilson, B. 2016. ‘Blaise’s opinions: Patriarchy vs. Third Wave Feminism –Part 2’.

Published
2021-03-26
How to Cite
Humaira Riaz. (2021). Innocent Texts Conspiring with Imperial Desire: A Critique of Nafisi’s Reading Lolita in Tehran. Linguistics and Literature Review, 7(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.32350/llr.71.04
Section
Articles