Archetypes and Creative Imagination in ‘Ode to Psyche’: A Jungian Analysis
Abstract
Abstract Views: 430
John Keats’ ‘Ode to Psyche’ is steeped in mythology and dream symbolism, which encourages us to understand it from the perspective of depth psychology/archetypal criticism. The odes of John Keats have been studied from historicist, feminist, and biographical perspectives. This paper aims to complement these perspectives by elaborating the mythical dream imagery of the poem as referring symbolically to the process of psychic integration and poetic creativity. The paper also views the poem as exemplifying the need for a complementary ongoing communication between the conscious and the unconscious aspects of the mind to maintain a holistic psyche. Archetypal theory is used to frame the figurative structure of the poem as a symbolic mythical variant of the process of poetic creativity. The paper employs three theoretical constructs, namely syzygy or complementation of opposites; active imagination; and individuation, as a framework to analyze the poem from an archetypal perspective. Employing a depth psychological perspective to understand poetry enhances the aesthetic pleasure derived from reading poetry and enhances the 'healing effect' of poetry by illuminating the psychological connotations of the poem. The paper concludes by attempting to answer two research questions explored in the analysis. First, does archetypal perspective contribute to enhancing readers' aesthetic pleasure derived from reading poetry? Second, what are the theoretical contributions of the current analysis towards contemporary Jungian literary theory?
Keywords: Jungian analysis, anima, animus, active imagination, syzygy, individuationDownloads
References
Ali Shah, S. Z., and Khattak, N. J. 2014. Facing the" Other"--within and without: The mariner's 64shadow in The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Putaj Humanities & Social Sciences21(2): 173-180.
Caputo, G. B. 2013. Archetypal-imaging and mirror-gazing. Behavioral Sciences4(1): 1-13.
Cox, J. N. 1998. Poetry and politics in the Cockney school: Keats, Shelley, Hunt and their circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dawson, T. 2008. Literary criticism and analytical psychology. The Cambridge Companion to Jung, 269-298.https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521865999
Dawson, T. 2012. Myth and the creative imagination in The Book of Urizen. International Journal of Jungian Studies4(2): 87-103.
Dobson, D. 2005. Archetypal literary theory in the postmodern era. Journal of Jungian ScholarlyStudies 1(1): 1-16.
Dobson, D. 2011. Interacting narratives: Acknowledging the self in the construction of professional knowledge. Journal of Jungian Scholarly Studies7(1): 1-10.
Faflak, J. 2009. Romantic psychoanalysis: The burden of the mystery.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Hühn, P., and Kiefer, J. 2005. The narratological analysis of lyric poetry: Studies in English Poetry from the 16th to the 20th century. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
Jabeen, A., and Umme-Habiba.2018. The archetypal analysis of Tomorrow by Graham Swift. Linguistics and Literature Review4(2): 81-90.
Jung, C. G. 1935. The Tavistock lectures. Collected Works. London: Routledge.
Jung, C. G. 2014a. On the nature of the psyche.London: Routledge.
Jung, C. G. 2014b. Psychological types. Collected Works of CG Jung, 542-555. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. 2014c. The spirit of man in art and literature.London: Routledge.
Jung, C. G., and Campbell, J. 1971. The portable Jung.London: Penguin Classics.
Keats, J. 1899. The complete poetical works and letters of John Keats.New York, NY: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
Salman, S. 1997. The creative psyche: Jung's major contribution. In The Cambridge Companion to Jung, eds. P. Young-Eisendrath, & T. Dawson. London: Cambridge University Press.
Stillinger, J. 1968. Introduction: Imagination and reality in the odes of Keats. In Twentieth Century Interpretations of Keats’s Odes, ed.J. Stillinger, 1-16. Englewood Cliffs,N.J. : Prentice-Hall.
Swann, K. 1988. Harassing themuse. In Romanticism and Feminism, ed. A. Mellor, 81-92. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Tariq, I. 2019. Shadow of the father: Evidence of electra complex in Benazir Bhutto’sDaughter of the East. Linguistics and Literature Review 5(2): 89-105.
Ulanov, A. 1997. Jung and religion: The opposing Self. In The Cambridge Companion to Jung, eds. P. Young-Eisendrath, & T. Dawson, 296-313. London: Cambridge University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
