Actantial Paradigm of Narrative Structures in Techno-thriller and Visionary Fiction

Ramsha Khan; Azka Khan

doi:10.32350/llr.102.01

Ramsha Khan WAPDA Postgraduate College, Tarbela, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Azka Khan Department of English, Rawalpindi Women University, Pakistan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/llr.102.01

Keywords: actants, actantial theory, structuralism, techno-thriller, visionary fiction

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

This study examines the structural patterns of two radically distinct genres, namely techno-thriller and visionary fiction, by focusing on the actantial elements of fictional works. It seeks to clarify misconceptions about traditional literary analysis by comparing the novels Rumi's Daughter by Maufroy (2004) and Deception Point by Brown (2001). The actant theory, first introduced by Greimas (1971) and later amended by Hébert (2020), is employed to analyze the roles of characters, exploring both their similarities and differences within the internal narrative structure of the selected novels. The study investigates narratives’ universal “grammar” by focusing on three pairings of binary oppositions, that is, subject/object, sender/receiver, and helper/opponent. Despite the differences in theme, culture, characters, and genre, the study shows that the characters’ narrative structure and actantial function are the same, proving Greimas’ claim that the actantial theory applies to all narratives. This study contributes to the basic understanding of the fundamental patterns that connect human narratives, despite the apparent differences between the civilizations they belong to.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, J. (2007). Interference patterns. Bucknell University Press.

Brown, D. (2001). Deception point. Simon & Schuster.

Cobley, P. (2016). Narrative. In P. Moy (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in communication. Oxford University Press.

Greaney, M. (2006). Contemporary fiction and the uses of theory: The novel from structuralism to postmodernism. Palgrave Macmillian.

Greimas, A. J. (1971). Narrative grammar: Units and levels. Modern Language Notes, 86(6), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.2307/2907443

Hébert, L. & Tabler, J. (2020). An introduction to applied semiotics: Tools for text and image analysis. Routledge.

Hébert, L. (2011). Tools for text and image analysis an introduction to applied semiotics: The Actantial model. University of Quebec. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=8efb82b11a799ff9481354036b5bab3140632213

Hernandez, G. L., Drzewiecka, J. A., & Greco, S. (2023). FortressEurope integrating through division: An actantial narrative analysis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(4), 1437–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2171968

Maufroy, M. (2004). Rumi’s daughter. Random House.

Max, J. I. S. D., Sudirman, E. P., Rahayu, F. E. S., & Nugroho, B. A. (2023). Discourse in billboard woman of the decade award: An actantial analysis. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya, 17(1), 39–55.

Oktodila, H. T., & Hapsarani, D. (2023). Actantial model as a tool in analyzing video games narrative. In S. M. G. Tambunan (Ed.), Fourth Asia-Pacific research in social sciences and humanities, arts and humanities stream (pp. 409–419). Atlantis Press.

Telli, P., & Mahdiar, M. (2015). Barthesian narrative codes as a technique for the analysis of Attar’s ‘Sheikh San’an’. Persian Literary Studies Journal, 3(4), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.22099/jps.2015.2901

Thomsen, U. (1990). A structuralist approach. Scandinavian Studies, 62(4), Article e403.

Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide. Routledge.

Vilhjálmsdóttir, G., & Tulinius, T. H. (2009). Tales of two subjects: Narratives of career counseling. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.008

Wang, Y., & Roberts, C. W. (2005). Actantial analysis: Greimas's structural approach to the analysis of self-narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 15(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.15.1.04wan