Alignment of Punjab Textbook Board’s English Textbooks with the National Curriculum for English (2006): An Evaluative Study
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
In Pakistan, English language textbooks are considered as the most authentic and useful material for English language teaching. They are expected to fulfil the objectives stated in the National Curriculum for English, 2006. The Federal Government has complete control over designing and selecting the content of the textbooks. Pakistani society is challenged by religious, cultural, and ethnic diversity. In view of this diversity, a curriculum is expected to promote national identity and unity among various groups. Therefore, the national agenda is disseminated and promoted through textbooks to build a cohesive society. Pakistan is a developing country, where traditional methods and techniques are used to teach language. Hence, it becomes necessary to minutely evaluate the teaching material. For this purpose, textbooks taught in the Intermediate level English classes are evaluated in this research, keeping in view the objectives stated in the National Curriculum. Data has been taken from the four textbooks taught at the Higher Secondary School Certificate (HSSC) level in Punjab, Pakistan. Data is evaluated by using the qualitative approach as summation and calculations are involved in the analysis. The analysis of the exercises and the content shows various types of deviations from the objectives of the Curriculum. The study finds that most textbook exercises are partially aligned with the Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) of benchmarks, standards, and competencies mentioned in the National Curriculum. The study also suggests the ways to synchronize the selected textbooks with the policy document which would ultimately improve the overall English language skills of the students.
Downloads
References
Afzal, M. (2015, April 1). Education and attitudes in Pakistan: Understanding perceptions of terrorism. US Institute of Peace. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/SR367-Education-and-Attitudes-in-Pakistan.pdf
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8.
Barr, R. (1988). Conditions influencing content taught in nine fourth-grade mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 88(4), 387–411.
Carter, J. L. (1987). Who determines textbook content? Journal of College Science Teaching, 16(5), 425–468.
Chingos, M. M., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2012, April 10). Choosing blindly: Instructional materials, teacher effectiveness, and the common core. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/choosing-blindly-instructional-materials-teacher-effectiveness-and-the-common-core/
Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36
English, F. W. (1992). Deciding what to teach and test: Developing, aligning, and auditing the curriculum. In F. W. English (Ed.), Successful schools: Guidebooks to effective educational leadership. Corwin Press.
Farooq, R. A. (1993). Education system in Pakistan: Issues and problems. Asia Society for Promotion of Innovation and Reform in Education.
Genesee, F. (2001). Evaluation. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 144–150). Cambridge University Press.
Giunchi, E. (2007). Rewriting the past: Political imperatives and curricular reform in Pakistan. Internationale Schulbuchforschung, 29(4), 375–388.
Helm, E. M. (1951). Evaluating the textbook. The American Journal of Nursing, 51(8), 522–523.
Hill, H. C. (2001). Policy is not enough: Language and the interpretation of state standards. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 289–318. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002289
Hilton, J. (1973). Good-Bye, Mr. Chips. Punjab Text Book Board.
Jamil, M., Yousaf, A., & Naqvi, S. U. E. L. Enhancing sustainability education in Pakistan: analysis of Pakistan studies textbook grade xii. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1039-1046. https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/732
Naseem, M. A. (2014). Deconstructing militarism in Pakistani textbooks. Journal of Educational Media Memory & Society, 6(2), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/jemms.2014.060202
Oliver, A. I. (1965). Curriculum improvement: A guide to problems, principles and procedures. Dodd, Mead & Company.
Polikoff, M. S. (2015). How well aligned are textbooks to the common core standards in mathematics? American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1185–1211. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215584435
Punjab Textbook Board. (2018). Intermediate English book III. Government of the Punjab.
Punjab Textbook Board. (2020a). Intermediate English book- I. Government of the Punjab.
Punjab Textbook Board. (2020b). Intermediate English book-II. (2020). Government of the Punjab.
Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R. T., & Cogan, L. S. (2002). A coherent curriculum: A case of mathematics. American Educator, 26, 10–26.
Shoukat, B., & Ghani, M. (2015). English language teachers’ opinion on intermediate English textbooks taught in Punjab, Pakistan. The Dialogue, 10(3), 312–324.
Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Harvard University.
Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. (2007). How curriculum influences students' learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557–628). Information Age Publishing.
Copyright (c) 2024 Shahbaz Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
