Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Language Learning Tools for Phonics Instruction: Implications for Very Young Learners
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
Phonics, as a teaching method, helps the learners to establish a connection between graphemes and phonemes. Moreover, it also improves their reading and pronunciation skills alongside spelling and vocabulary. In this context, the current study attempts to investigate the effectiveness of using technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) tools as a supplementary resource to teach systematic synthetic phonics to a government school's KG- Grade 1 learners. For this purpose, 60 Grade KG-1 primary-level learners were selected through one group pretest-posttest design. After conducting the pretest, learners were taught phonics skills, that is A-Z letter-sound correspondence, blending, and segmenting of CVC words through digital tools for 27 weeks. Afterwards, a posttest was administered. The statistical analysis of pretest and posttest revealed a significant improvement in learning all three aspects of phonics instruction as the dependent paired sample t-test affirmed rather significant results, that is, p = 0.000 for all three categories. Furthermore, the analysis of gender, age, and interest variables exhibited the TELL intervention's positive impact on all the participants. Hence, TELL tools are proposed as supplementary materials for phonics instruction in government schools of Pakistan at the primary level to help the learners and teachers.
Downloads
References
Alonge, S., Obadare, F. T., & Obateru, O. T., (2017). Effect of differentiated phonics instructional strategy on primary school pupil’s learning outcomes in English literacy skills in Ikere - Ekiti. KIU Journal of Humanities, 2(1), 339–343.
Ayala, S. M., & O’Connor, R. (2013). The effects of video self‐modeling on the decoding skills of children at risk for reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12012
Birdsong, D. (Ed.). (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis: Second language research and methodological issues. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Buckingham, J. (2018, July). Systematic synthetic phonics. Five from Five. https://fivefromfive.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/RB2-SSP.pdf
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Chen, I. C. (2018). The application of augmented reality in English phonics learning performance of ESL young learners [Paper presentation]. 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3). Okinawa, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.000-7
Chun, D. M. (2021). Computer-assisted pronunciation teaching. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0172.pub2
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publishers.
Ehri, L. C. (1996) Sight word reading and its development in beginning readers of English and German. In E. Witruk & G. Friedrich (Eds.), Padagogische Psychologie im Streit um einneues Selbstverstandnis. Verlag Empirische Padagogik.
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21.
Ellington, H., Percival, F., & Race, P. (1993). Handbook of educational technology. Kogan Page.
Er, S. (2014). Which is the most appropriate strategy for very young language learners? International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 4(4), 829–837.
Five from Five. (2018, November 27). Approaches to phonics instruction. https://fivefromfive.com.au/approaches-to-phonics-instruction/
Get Reading Right. (2014, April 10). Analytic phonics vs synthetic phonics. http://www.getreadingright.com.au/analytic-phonics-vs-synthetic-phonics/
Habib, A., Shehzad, K., & Uzair, M. (2018). Coverage of pronunciation: An analytical study of English textbooks in Pakistan. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(2), 47–63.
Henbest, V. S., & Apel, K. (2017). Effective word reading instruction: What does the evidence tell us? Communication Disorders Quarterly, 39, 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740116685183
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Houston, S. (2021, July 15). Phonics assessment: Don’t assume – assess! Phonics Hero. https://phonicshero.com/phonics-assessment/
Howorth, S., Rooks-Ellis, D., Flanagan, S., & Ok, M. W. (2019). Use of the augmented reality application to support reading skills of students with autism spectrum disorder. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219837635
Imaniah, I., & Nargis. (2017). Teaching English for young learners. FKIP UMT Press.
Krapp, A., Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. Wiley Publishers.
Lin, C. Y., Yu, W. J., Chen, W. J., Huang, C. W., & Lin, C. C. (2016, July 17–22). The effect of literacy learning via mobile augmented reality for the students with ADHD and reading disabilities (Paper presentation). International conference on universal access in human-computer interaction, Toronto, Canada.
Machin, S., McNally, S., & Viarengo, M. (2018). Changing how literacy is taught: Evidence on synthetic phonics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(2), 217–241.
Mehrpour, S., & Mirsanjari, Z. (2016). Investigating the manifestation of teaching expertise feature among novice and experienced EFL teachers. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 18, 168–197.
Mifsud, J. & Agius, R. (2018). Investigating word blending skills in Maltese children. Malta Journal of Health Sciences, 5, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.14614/WORDBLEND/9/18
Moats, L. C. (2020). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers (3rd ed.). Brookes Publishing.
Moats, L. C., & Tolman, C. A. (2019). Language essentials for teachers of reading and spelling: Primary school and learning support teachers. Voyager Sopris. https://auspeld.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/DSF7332-LETRS-Brochure_V5_Singles.pdf
Naseem, S. Shah, S. K., & Tabassum, S. (2015). Evaluation of English textbook in Pakistan: A case study of Punjab textbook for 9th class. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 3(3), 24–42.
National Curriculum Council. (2020). Early childhood care and education grade PRE I 2020. https://mofept.gov.pk/SiteImage/Misc/files/SNC%20ECCE.pdf
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
Nemattabrizi, A. R., & Karimzadeh, P. (2016). The influence of teaching sight words and phonics simultaneously on improving reading comprehension of Iranian Elementary EFL learners with a focus on gender. Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 4(1), 421–431.
Newton, J. M., & Nation, I. S. (2020). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.
Ok, M. W., Haggerty, N., & Whaley, A. (2020). Effects of video modeling using an augmented reality ipad application on phonics performance of students who struggle with reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1723152
Otterstedt, P. (2016) A handbook in English pronunciation for Swedish learners and teachers. Falkenberg.
Oxford Owl. (2016, May 5). Oxford owl: Help your child learn. https://cdn.oxfordowl.co.uk/2016/05/05/20/22/32/561/20097_content/index.html?id=ae#
Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Oxford Phonics World. https://elt.oup.com/student/oxfordphonicsworld/
Oxford, R. L., & Lin, C.-Y. (2011). Autonomous learners in digital realms: Exploring strategies for effective digital language learning. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives (pp. 157–171). Hong Kong University Press.
Patel, P., Torppa, M., Aro, M., Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2021). Assessing the effectiveness of a game‐based phonics intervention for first and second grade English language learners in India: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12592
Peng, P., & Goodrich, J. M. (2020). The cognitive element model of reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S77–S88. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.336
Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson-Revell, P. (2018). English pronunciation teaching and research: Contemporary perspectives Palgrave Macmillan.
Phonics Hero. (2020, April 26). Synthetic phonics explained. https://phonicshero.com/synthetic-phonics/
Phonics International. (2008, February 9). Phonics international – An online systematic synthetic phonics programme. https://phonicsinternational.com/
Pimentel, S. (2018). Why doesn’t every teacher know the research on reading instruction? Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-why-doesnt-every-teacher-know-the-research-on-reading-instruction/2018/10
Pinkett, E. D. (2020). The effects of phonics instruction in pre-kindergarten on first grade reading levels (Publication No. 27743930) [Doctoral University, Wilmington University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://tinyurl.com/32389p7e
Pinter, A. (2011). Children learning second languages. Palgrave Macmillan
Putra, J. R. (2015). Creating a positive English language teaching and learning environment in EYL classroom setting. Teylin, 2, 218–261.
Rahmah, W., & Pandjaitan, L. N. (2017). The effectivity of phonics method in improving reading ability of 1st grade elementary school students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 173, 380–382.
Ren, H., & Ma, C. (2018, September 21–23). The intrinsic logic of English phonics learning among Chinese school-age children (Paper presentation). 8th International Conference on Management, Education and Information. Shenyang, China. https://doi.org/10.2991/meici-18.2018.151
Renninger, K. & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771045
Ritchey, K. D., & Goeke, J. L. (2006). Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400030501
Rose, J. (2006) Independent review of the teaching of early reading. Department for Education and Skills. www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/rosereview
Saed, H. A., Haider, A. S., Al-Salman, S., & Hussein, R. F. (2021). The use of YouTube in developing the speaking skills of Jordanian EFL university students. Heliyon, 7(7), Article e07543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07543
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500200135
Singleton, D. (2001). Age and second language Acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000058
Syed, N. M., Quraishi, U., & Kazi, A. S. (2019). English language textbook and development of oral communicative competence in grade VIII Students of public sector schools in Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(1), 105–118.
Warnick, K., & Caldarella, P. (2015). Using multisensory phonics to foster reading skills of adolescent delinquents. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 32(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.962199
Widyanaa, R., Astutib, K., Bahrussofac, M. F., & Simanjuntakd, G. M. B. (2020). The effectiveness of jolly phonics and multisensory learning methods in improving preschoolers pre-reading skill. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(8), 1–13.
Zechner, K., & Evanini, K. (Eds.). (2019). Automated speaking assessment: Using language technologies to score spontaneous speech. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165103
Zielinski, B., & Yates, L. (2014). Pronunciation instruction is not appropriate for beginning-level learners. In L. Grant (Ed.), Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 56–79). University of Michigan Press.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sadia Malik, Dr. Muhammad Imdadullah, Munaza Javed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
