The Evolution of Humour: A Generational Analysis Dad Jokes and Dark Humour among Boomers and Gen Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32350/llr.121.05%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20Keywords:
baby boomers, dad jokes, dark humour, generational humour, generation ZAbstract
Humour can be seen as entertainment but in addition, it indicates the cultural values, emotional coping methods, and social images that are particular to various generations. Despite extensive research on humour as a topic, there is minimal scholarly literature to explain the impact of specific humour types and preferences. To fill this gap, the paper explores unique humour preferences through a psychological, social, and cultural framework that helps shape the humour styles of Baby Boomers and Generation Z. Both quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews were used in a mixed-methods design that enabled a detailed investigation. A sample of 50 purposively selected participants was drawn to represent each of the generational cohorts with respect to their demographic characteristics. Quantitative data would be collected via structured questionnaires to assess differences in humour preferences, and qualitative data were collected through 8 semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed definite generational distinctions: Baby Boomers enjoyed dad jokes because of their emotional congruence and their ability to establish deeper connections, whereas members of Generation Z preferred dark humour because of its role as a coping mechanism and means of social identification. Moreover, Generation Z was more open to sharing humour online even when it involved taboo topics compared with Baby Boomers, who appreciated humour in more closed and traditional environments. The study concludes that Baby Boomers tend to prefer humour that reinforces tradition and evokes a sense of emotional familiarity, whereas Generation Z is more drawn to humour characterised by complexity, subversion, and responses to contemporary fears and concerns.These findings can guide educationists, media practitioners, and mental health care providers in promoting empathy, communication models, and emotional adaptation among age groups.
Downloads
References
Arnett, J., Chapin, L., & Brownlow, C. (2018). Human development: A cultural approach. Pearson Australia Group.
Aronson, P., & Jaffal, I. (2021/2022). Zoom Memes for Self-Quaranteens: Generational Humor, Identity, and Conflict During the Pandemic. Emerging Adulthood, 10(2), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968211058513
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101
Fink, E. L., & Walker, B. A. (1977). Humorous responses to embarrassment. Psychological Reports, 40(2), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1977.40.2.475
Highfield, T. (2018). Social media and everyday politics. Croatian International Relations Review, 24(82), 142–145
Hofmann, J., Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Platt, T., & Gander, F. (2017). Assessing dispositions toward ridicule and laughter in the workplace: Adapting and validating the PhoPhiKat-9 questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article e714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00714
Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., & Adams, R. B., Jr. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9027.001.0001
Hye-Knudsen, M. (2021). Dad jokes and the deep roots of fatherly teasing. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 5(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.26613/esic.5.2.248
Jiang, T., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2019). Cultural differences in humor perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
Kuipers, G. (2015). Good humor, bad taste: A sociology of the joke (2nd rev. ed.). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510441
Lynch, O. H. (2002). Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research. Communication Theory, 12(4), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277.x
Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press.
McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073
Morreall, J. (2009). Comic relief: A comprehensive philosophy of humor. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307795
Partlow, C., & Talarczyk, P. (2021). Absurdism and Generation Z humor: The effects of absurdist content on perceived humor levels in Generation Z students. Journal of Student Research, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i4.2011
Patel, S. (2024). A study of liking and acceptance about meme-marketing among youth culture. Journal of Media & Management, 6(9), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.47363/JMM/2024(6)173
Phillips, W., & Milner, R. M. (2017). The ambivalent internet: Mischief, oddity, and antagonism online. Polity.
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001
Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(1), 13–23.
Torres, J. M., Pariña, J. C. M., Collantes, L. M., & Tan, R. K. (2020). Humor styles and perceptions of college students in Central Luzon. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(2.1), 196–209.
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood—and what that means for the rest of us. Atria Books.
Zillmann, D. (2000). Humor and comedy. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 37–58). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604811
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mubashra Mushtaq, Dr. Amra Raza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
