Learning for Peace and Coexistence
Action Research to Improve Student Attitudes
Abstract
Abstract Views: 96
Living in 21st century means living in a totally new world full of challenges both for the educators and the learners. The aim of a postmodern university is to enable human beings to live more meaningful and satisfying lives by promoting social justice, peace and harmony in the world. It can only be achieved by teaching students critical thinking or developing among students the capacity to look at problems from various perspectives and thus reduce the chances of conflict. Therefore, the aim of this study was to improve student’s higher order thinking skills and attitude towards life and learning. For this purpose specific activities were designed for undergraduate students enrolled in the course ‘Introduction to Psychology’, so that they may become more aware of their cognitive processes, increase their perspective-taking, revisit their rational skills, and be able to establish new links with their society and culture. Innovations through visual media and psychological testing were introduced in four steps backed with formative assessment. Qualitative feedback was collected by the end of the course from the students about the course material, teaching methodology, and the innovations used describing how they personally relate to this experience. The
results show that students like innovative technology used in the classroom and some even related to it as the most relevant and meaningful experience of their lives.
Downloads
References
Aas, M. (2014). Towards a reflection repertoire: Using a thinking tool to understand tensions in an action research project. Educational Action Research, (22)3, 441– 454,
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain S. D. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cain, T. & Harris, R. (2013). Teachers’ action research in a culture of performativity.
Educational Action Research, 21(3), 343–358.
Capra, F. (2003). The hidden connections. London: Flamingo, Harper & Collins. Dick, B. & Dalmau, T. (1990). To tame a unicorn: Recipes for cultural intervention.
Chapel Hill: Interchange.
Fischbach, R. (2005). Toward more productive higher education systems. National Education Association (NEA): Thought & Action, NEA-Fall, 81–90.
Ford, M. P. (2002). Beyond the modern university: Toward a constructive postmodern university. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Foucault, M. (1972). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–
Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Harvester Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action for freedom. Harmonsdworth: Penguin. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmonsdworth: Penguin.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1991). What's worth fighting for? Working together for your school. Hawthorn, Vic: ERIC.
Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand? New York: Simon & Schuster.
Gibbs, P. (2014). Deliberation, capability and action research: Knowledge and becoming. Educational Action Research, 22(3), 428–440.
Glasser, W. (1999). Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom. New York: Harper Perrenial.
Hawkins, K. A. (2015). The complexities of participatory action research and the problems of power, identity and influence. Educational Action Research, 23(4), 464–478.
Johnston, W. J., Gürsel, I., Montana, J., & Spender, C. (2011). Design thinking in the postmodern organization. China-USA Business Review, 10(11), 1203–1212.
Kayaoglu, M. N. (2015). Teacher researchers in action research in a heavily centralized education system. Educational Action Research, 23(2), 140–161.
Kidd, S. A., & Kral, M. J. (2005). Practicing participatory research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 187–195.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In Norman Denzin & Yvonna Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.), (pp. 559–603). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (2008). Conclusions and challenges. In S. Kemmis & T. J. Smith. (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 263–286). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Kock, N. F., Jr. (1997). Myths in organizational action research: Reflections on a study of computer-supported process redesign groups. Organizations & Society, 4(9), 65–91.
McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.
Miller, B. M., Kral, M., Maguire, M. P., Noffke, S., & Sabhlok, A. (2011). Jazz and the banyan tree: Roots and riffs on participatory action research. In Norman Denzin, and Yvonna Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 387–400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mouasher, A., & Lodge, J. M. (2016). The search for pedagogical dynamism – Esign patterns and the unselfconscious process. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (2), 274–285.
Nolen, A. L., & Putten, J. V. (2007). Action research in education: Addressing gaps in ethical principles and practices. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 401–407.
Pham, T. T., & Renshaw, P. (2013). How to enable Asian teachers to empower students to adopt student-centered learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), 65–85
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher. 28(7), 4–14.
Samaras, A. P., Kayler, M. A., Rigsby, L. C., Weller, K. L., & Wilcox, D. R. (2006). Self-study of the craft of faculty team teaching in a non-traditional teacher education program. Studying Teacher Education, 2(1), 43–57.
Samarawickrema, G., & Stacey, E. (2007). Adopting web-based learning and teaching: A case study in higher education. Distance Education, 28(3), 313.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Schon, D. (Ed.). (1991). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Smith, W. D. (2003). Higher education, democracy, and the public sphere. Thought & Action, 19(1), 61–73.
Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodeling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5–21.
Suter, W. N. (2006). Introduction to educational research: A critical thinking approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, P. (1998). Institutional change in uncertain times: Lone ranging is not enough.
Studies in Higher Education. 23, 269–279.
Wong, A. C. K. (2014). Moving from a transmission to a social reform teaching perspective: Using teachers’ action research as critical pedagogy in higher education. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 15(3), 48–64.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors
