Incorporating Customer Requirements in Designing Academic Graduate Program
A Case of Using Quality Function Deployment
Abstract
Abstract Views: 63
Course design is an important component in the success of academic programs. Design and execution of the academic programs according to the industry lead to the career success of university graduates. This study narrates the process through which the academic program Master of Science in Supply Chain Management (MS-SCM) was designed by a university in Pakistan based on customer demands, considering prospective employers as customers. In order to convert customer requirements into program courses, the technique of “Quality Function Deployment” (QFD) was used. The “House of Quality” (HOQ) was used to translate the customer requirements into
courses to be offered in the program. A small-scale survey of the managers involved in the recruitment of new graduates in their respective supply chain related departments from a variety of organizations was conducted in order to learn about the voice of customer. Based on the demands of the managers, courses with suitable content were identified that meet the requirements of potential employers. This study shows how by using QFD, providers of higher education can customize their academic programs to meet the requirements of the customers.
Downloads
References
Andronikidis, A., Georgiou, A. C., Gotzamani, K., & Kamvysi, K. (2009). The application of quality function deployment in service quality management. The TQM Journal, 21(4), 319–333.
Aytac, A., & Deniz, V. (2005). Quality function deployment in education: a curriculum review. Quality & Quantity, 39(4), 507–514.
Basnet, C., Corner, J., Wisner, J., & Tan, K. C. (2003). Benchmarking supply chain management practice in New Zealand. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8(1), 57–64.
Carnevalli, J. A., & Miguel, P. C. (2008). Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—Types of research, difficulties and benefits. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 737–754.
Christopher, M., & Towill, D. R. (2002). Developing market specific supply chain strategies. International Journal of Logistics Management, The, 13(1), 1–14.
Cruickshank, M. (2003). Total Quality Management in the higher education sector: a literature review from an international and Australian perspective. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 14(10), 1159–1167.
Duffuaa, S. O., Al-Turki, U. M., & Hawsawi, F. M. (2003). Quality function deployment for designing a basic statistics course. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(6), 740–750.
Ermer, D. S., & Kniper, M. K. (1998). Delighting the customer: Quality function deployment for quality service design. Total Quality Management, 9(4-5), 86–91.
Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard business review, 75, 105–117.
Gonzalez, M. E., Quesada, G., Gourdin, K., & Hartley, M. (2008). Designing a supply chain management academic curriculum using QFD and benchmarking. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(1), 36–60.
Griffin, A. (1992). Evaluating QFD's use in US firms as a process for developing products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 171–187.
Hauser, J. R., & Clausing, D. (1988). The house of quality.
Heizer, J. H., & Render, B. (2008). Operations management (9 ed. Vol. 1): Pearson Education India.
Hwarng, H. B., & Teo, C. (2001). Translating customers’ voices into operations requirements-A QFD application in higher education. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(2), 195–226.
Jaraiedi, M., & Ritz, D. (1994). Total quality management applied to engineering education. Quality Assurance in Education, 2(1), 32–40.
Lam, K., & Zhao, X. (1998). An application of quality function deployment to improve the quality of teaching. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(4), 389–413.
Liu, S.-F., Lee, Y.-L., Lin, Y.-Z., & Tseng, C.-F. (2013). Applying quality function deployment in industrial design curriculum planning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 1147–1160.
Mazur, G. H. (1996). The application of quality function deployment (QFD) to design a course in total quality management (TQM) at the University of Michigan College of Engineering.
Mukaddes, A. M. M., Bagum, N., Islam, M. A., & Khan, M. M. A. (2012). The application of quality function deployment to improve the teaching techniques in higher education. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 1, 11(1-2), 97–109.
Owlia, M. S., & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 4(2), 12–20.
Pitman, G., Motwani, J., Kumar, A., & Cheng, C. H. (1996). QFD application in an educational setting: A pilot field study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13(4), 99–108.
Sivasamy, K., Arumugam, C., Devadasan, S., Murugesh, R., & Thilak, V. (2015). Advanced models of quality function deployment: a literature review. Quality & Quantity, 1–16.
Spekman, R. E., Kamauff Jr, J. W., & Myhr, N. (1998). An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 53–67.
Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. (2003). Developing alternative perspectives for quality in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(3), 126–136.
Stuart, F. I., & Tax, S. S. (1996). Planning for service quality: an integrative approach.
International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7(4), 58–77.
Temponi, C. (2005). Continuous improvement framework: implications for academia.
Quality Assurance in Education, 13(1), 17–36.
Temtime, Z. T., & Mmereki, R. N. (2011). Challenges faced by graduate business education in Southern Africa: perceptions of MBA participants. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(2), 110–129.
Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(3), 227–244.
Vinayak, K., & Kodali, R. (2013). Benchmarking the quality function deployment models. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(6), 825–854.
Wolniak, E. R., & Sȩdek, A. (2009). Using QFD method for the ecological designing of products and services. Quality & Quantity, 43(4), 695–701.
Zhang, F., Yang, M., & Liu, W. (2014). Using integrated quality function deployment and theory of innovation problem solving approach for ergonomic product design. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 76, 60–74.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors
