Resilience
An Emic Perspective of Adolescents with Disabilities from Segregated and Integrated Schools
Abstract
Abstract Views: 110Education creates opportunities for marginalized communities to win emancipation from the hardships of life. Adolescents with disabilities are at a severe disadvantage in many parts of the world, especially Pakistan. Literature provides very little information about the personal perceptions and opinions of adolescents with disabilities about their school life. The current study aimed to explore the dynamics of resilience (ability to bounce back) from the emic perspective of adolescents with disabilities in both segregated (special) and integrated (mainstream) schools. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing resilience were explored using a qualitative research design. Three rounds of semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescents with disabilities (N=13) from both segregated (n=9) and integrated (n=4) schools. The data obtained was analyzed through the Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). The results revealed that all participants of the study possessed basic characteristics of resilience including recovery, active coping, positive emotionality and social connectedness. Further in-depth analysis indicated a marked difference between the approach of segregated and integrated schools determined by supportive factors in recovery, problems faced in daily functioning due to disability, reasons for social connectedness, purpose in life and self-reliance. From the findings it is evident that the school environment, teachers’ cooperation and peer support are key distinguishing factors among the two groups under study. School support is very important for personal as well as well as psycho-social development of adolescents with disabilities.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, T. (1995). The population of persons with disabilities in Pakistan.
Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 10(1), 39–62.
Alam, M. (2016). Ageing, functional disabilities and its gender dimensions: Results based on a study in Delhi. In Zachary Zimmer, Global ageing in the twenty-first century: Challenges, opportunities and implications (1st ed. pp. 33-48). London: Routledge.
Bengtsson, S., & Datta, G. N. (2017). Identifying the effects of education on the ability to cope with a disability among individuals with disabilities. PLoSONE, 12(3), e0173659.
Bernard, B. (2014). The foundations of the resiliency framework. Retrieved from https://www.resiliency.com/free-articles-resources/the- foundations-of-the-resiliency-framework/
Bonanno, A, G., & Diminich, D. E. (2013). Annual research review: Positive adjustment to adversity–trajectories of minimal–impact resilience and emergent resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(4), 378–401.
Breda, D. A., & Theron, C. L. (2018). A critical review of South African child and youth resilience studies 2009–2017. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 237–247.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain, & M. Cole (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Education (vol. 3, pp. 37– 43). New York: Freeman.
Bullock, L. M., Zolkoski, S. M., & Estes, M. B. (2015). Meeting the mental health needs of children and youth: Using evidence-based education worldwide. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 20(4), 398–414.
Bullock, M. L., & Zolkoski, M. S. (2012). Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2295–2303.
Cenat, M. J., & Derivois, D. (2014). Psychometric properties of the creole Haitian version of the resilience scale amongst child and adolescent survivors of 2010 Earthquake. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55, 388–
Daniel, B. (2007). The concept of resilience. In Andrew Kendrick (Ed.), Residential child care: Prospects and challenges (Research highlights in social work 47). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Daniel, B., & Wassell, S. (2002). Adolescence: Assessing and promoting resilience in vulnerable children (vol. 3, pp.37–43). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Ehsan, M., (2018). Inclusive education in primary and secondary schools of Pakistan: Role of teachers.American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 40(1), 40–61.
Etieyibo, E., & Omiegbe, O. (2016). Religion, culture, and discrimination against persons with disabilities in Nigeria. African Journal of Disability, 5(1), 92-99
Farooq, M.S. (2012). Problem faced by students with special needs in ordinary Pakistani schools. E-Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 8 (I), 13–27.
Kumar, D. N., & Kumar, A. (2017). Human resource development in disability rehabilitation field: New challenges & issues to make the right real for persons with disabilities. EDULIGHT Journal. 6(12), 5-15.
Freriksen, E., de Laat, S., & Vervloed, M. P. (2013). Attitudes of children and adolescents toward persons who are deaf, blind, paralyzed or intellectually disabled. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 855–63.
Frey, K. M. (1987). Administrative implications of self-reported instructional beliefs and practices of secondary school teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of Arizona, Tucson.
Garde, R.A., Torres, M. G., Fuente, J.D., Vera, M. M., Cabezas, M. F., & García, L. M. (2017). Relationship between Resilience and self- regulation: A study of Spanish youth at risk of social exclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 612-622
Goering S. (2015). Rethinking disability: The social model of disability and chronic disease. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 8(2), 134–148.
Hall, S.J., Murray. E.K., & Zautra, J.A. (2010). Resilience: A new definition of health for people &communication. In W. S. Reich, S. J. Hall, & J.
A. Zautra (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp.3–25). New York: Guildford press.
Helping Hands for Relief and Development. (2012). Person with disabilities statistics in Pakistan. Retrieved from https://www.google.com.pk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s& source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCwQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhhrd. pk%2Fcrp%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F02%2FPWDs- Statistics-in-Pakistan-2012- 2.pdf&ei=nnC6U6_4Bajx0gX8qYCoAg&usg=AFQjCNHUoXLH8B NkCKR8ObNCgaBPvVEf-A&sig2=7kIZ0VCnPsGsuis-Bo0dDA
Katsui, H., & Mojtahedi, M. C. (2015). Intersection of disability and gender: Multi-layered experiences of Ethiopian women with disabilities. Development in Practice, 25(4), 563–573.
Krovetz, M. (1999). Fostering resiliency: Thrust resiliency. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 28(5), 28–31.
Lansdown, G. (2012). Using the human rights framework to promote the rights of children with disabilities: An analysis of the synergies between CRC, CRPD and CEDAW. New York, NY: UNICEF.
Lansdown, G. (2012).Using the human rights framework to promote the rights of children with disabilities (Working paper). Retrieved on 23-12- 2017from http://www.unicef.org/disabilities/files/Using_Human_Rights_Working_Pa per-2012.pdf
Masten, S. N., Narayan, J. A., & Wright, D. M. (2013). Resilience process in development: Four waves of research on practice adaptation in the context of adversity. In R. B. Brook, & S. Goldstein (Eds.). Handbook of resilience in children. New York: Springer.
Montgomery, A., Papadopoulos, K., Papakonstantinou, D., & Solomon, A. (2014). Social support and depression of adults with visual impairments. Research in Development Disability, 35(7), 1734–41.
Pasha, S. (2012). Readiness of urban primary schools for inclusive education in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflection in Education, 6(2), 113–128.
Raffety, E. (2018). The God of difference: Disability, youth ministry, and the difference anthropology makes. Journal of Disability and Religion. 22(4), 371–389.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and social sciences. London; New York: Teacher College.
Shareefa, M. (2015). Institutional and teacher readiness for inclusive education in schools of Hithadhoo, Addu, Maldives: A study of the perceptions of teachers. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 5(7), 6–14.
Sheridan, A. M. (2008). Whose literacy it is anyway? Strengths-Based guidelines for transforming the developmental environment of deaf children and Adolescents. In J. K. Pierce, & H. D. Zand (Eds.), Resilience in deaf children: Adaptation through emerging adulthood. New York: Springer.
Singal, N. (2015). Education of children with disabilities in India and Pakistan: An analysis of developments since 2000 (Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2015 Education for All 2000-2015: achievements and challenges). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
Tansey. N., Benzak, L. J., Kaya, C., & Ditchman, N., (2016). Resilience and quality of Life: An investigation of kumphers resilience model with persons with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 60(3), 163–174.
Teferra, T. (2005). Disability in Ethiopia: Issues, insights and implications.
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University Press.
The Union of the Physically Impaired against Segregation (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. Retrieved on 24-09-2017 from https://www.google.com.pk/?gws_rd=cr&ei=EbDFVNz6Ioi_PIaxgd AO#q=UPIAS+(1976)+%22Fundamental+Principles+of+Disability
%22+London+Union+of+the+Physically+Impaired+Against+Segreg ation
Ttofa, J. (2017). Nurturing emotional resilience in vulnerable children and young people: A practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Weir, K., (2017). Maximizing children’s resilience. Child Development, 48(8), 1–40.
World Health Organization. (2014, June 17). Disabilities. Retrieved on 17-12- 2017 from http://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford.
Zvoleyko, V, E., Kalashnikova, A. S., & Klimenko, T. K. (2016). Socialization of students with disabilities in an inclusive educational environment. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(14), 6469–6481.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors