The Role of Architecture in the Identification of Obstacles and Spatial Solutions to Inclusive Education
Abstract
Abstract Views: 320
Education is the basic right of every child. However, there are many barriers to education for children with special needs. These special needs are due to their physical or physiological make up and are the reason they often feel desolated, mostly due to the lack of educational facilities required to fulfil those needs that should be available for all. This conceptual paper attempts to outline the term ‘inclusive education’ in terms of the democratic principles established by the international community. The paper also attempts to discuss Pakistan’s progress in adopting inclusive education by analyzing the current institutional framework of the education sector and infrastructure constraints in mainstream schools. Various case studies about educational centers in Pakistan’s urban hubs have been analyzed also to learn more about the impediments in this regard. Moreover, data has been collected from 25 districts of Punjab to learn about the current status of public schools and to know whether or not they have been transformed into inclusive schools. Findings show that building design is a major barrier among other challenges. Building layout of an inclusive school has been presented as a model for making existing schools more inclusive for students with various disabilities, so that benefits of inclusion are drawn not only by the disabled but also by mainstream students.
Downloads
References
Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109–124.
Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge,
Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organizational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416,
Allan, J. (2007). Rethinking inclusive education: The philosophers of difference in practice (vol. 5). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Armstrong, D. (2005). Reinventing ‘inclusion’: New labour and the cultural politics of special education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 135– 151.
Armstrong, D. Armstrong, A. C., & Spandagou, I. (2011). Inclusion: by choice or by chance? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 29– 39.
Armstrong, F., Armstrong, D., & Barton, L. (2016). Inclusive education: Policy, contexts and comparative perspectives. London: Routledge.
Author (NA). (2002). National policy for persons with disabilities Pakistan. Islamabad: Ministry of Women Development, Social Welfare & Special Education.
Avsatthi, B. (2016). Deaf space: Architectural design support should adapt to this emerging diversity in architecture. Retrieved on 23-07-17 from https://archinect.com/HCADDS/release/deafspace-architectural- design-support-should-adapt-to-this-emerging-diversity-in- architecture
Baglieri, S., & Shapiro, A. (2017). Disability studies and the inclusive classroom. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Barley, L. (2013). Deaf space: Empathetic design provides architectural solutions for the hearing impaired. Retrieved on 23-07-17 from https://architizer.com/blog/deaf-space/
Barton, E. E., & Smith, B. J. (2015). Advancing high-quality preschool inclusion: A discussion and recommendations for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 69–78.
Behlol, M. G. (2011). Inclusive education: Preparation of teachers, challenges in classroom and future prospects. Pakistan Journal of Education, 28(2), 63–73.
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (Eds.). (1998). From them to us: An international study of inclusion in education. London: Routledge.
Booth, T., Ainscow, M., Black-Hawkins, K., Vaughan, M., & Shaw, L. (2000). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
Brereton, M., Sitbon, L., Abdullah, M. H. L., Vanderberg, M., & Koplick, S. (2015). Design after design to bridge between people living with cognitive or sensory impairments, their friends and proxies. CoDesign, 11(1), 4–20.
Carmona, M. (2015). Re-theorising contemporary public space: A new narrative and a new normative. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Place making and Urban Sustainability, 8(4), 373–405.
Christensen, C.A. (1992). Social justice and the construction of disability in schools. Australian Association of Special Education Newsletter, 3, 6– 8.
Durak, S., & Erkiliç, M. (2012). Inclusive education environments from the teachers' perspective: An inquiry in a Turkish primary school. Children, Youth and Environments, 22(1), 304–313.
Farooq, M.S. (2012). Problems faced by students with special needs in ordinary Pakistani schools. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 8(1), 13–27.
Gaudion, K., Hall, A., Myerson, J., & Pellicano, L. (2015). A designer's approach: How can autistic adults with learning disabilities be involved in the design process? CoDesign, 11(1), 49–69.
Gavaldá, J. M. S., & Qinyi, T. (2012). Improving the process of inclusive education in children with ASD in mainstream schools. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4072–4076.
Hameed, A. (2005). Removing barriers to inclusive education in Pakistan. Proceedings of the Second Regional Seminar on Childhood Disability. Dhaka, Bangladesh: BPF.
Hameed, A., & Fazil, H. (2012).Implications of UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities 2007 for education policy in Pakistan. EDULEARN11 Proceedings (pp. 584-589). Barcelona: IATED.
Higher Education Commission (HEC). (n.d.). Policy for students with disabilities for higher learning institutes in Pakistan. Islamabad: Author. Retrieved on 23-07-17 from http://hec.gov.pk/english/services/universities/Pages/Policy.aspx
Imray, P., & Colley, A. (2017). Inclusion is dead: Long live inclusion.
London: Routledge.
Imrie, R., & Hall, P. (2003). Inclusive design: Designing and developing accessible environments. London: Taylor & Francis
Johnson, C. A. (2014). Articulation of deaf and hearing spaces using deaf space design guidelines: A community based participatory research with the Albuquerque sign language academy (Unpublished Master’s thesis). The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico. Retrieved on 24-09-17 from http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/arch_etds/18
Knoop, S. L. (2013). Architecture for low vision: Site, building and interior design. Paper presented at the national institute of building sciences low vision design committee symposium. Retrieved 24-09-17 from https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.nibs.org/resource/resmgr/LVDC/lvdc2013
_paper_knoop.pdf
Lindsay, G. (2003). Inclusive education: A critical perspective. British Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 3–12.
Manzoor, A. (2015). Analysis of being unreached and its compatibility with available educational provisions (Unpublished MPhil Thesis). Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Martin, C. S. (2016). Exploring the impact of the design of the physical classroom environment on young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(4), 280–298.
McAllister, K. (2010). The ASD friendly classroom–design complexity, challenge and characteristics. Paper presented at the Design Research Society Conference. Retrieved on 24-09-17 from http://www.designresearchsociety.org/docsprocs/DRS2010/PDF/084. pdf.
McGuire, J.M., Scott, S.S., & Shaw, S.F. (2006). Universal design and its applications in educational environments. Remedial and Special Education, 27(3), 166–174.
Mittler, P. (2000). Working towards inclusive education. London: David Fulton.
Mostafa, M. (2008). An architecture for Autism: Concepts of design intervention for the autistic user. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 189–211.
Nightingale, K. P., Anderson, V., Onens, S., Fazil, Q., & Davies, H. (2019). Developing the inclusive curriculum: Is supplementary lecture recording an effective approach in supporting students with specific learning difficulties (SpLDs)? Computers & Education, 130, 13–25.
Page, T., & Thorsteinsson, G. (2018). An inclusive design study of wheelchair users in the built environment. Journal of Engineering, 6(1), 1–18.
Pasha, S. (2012). Readiness of urban primary schools for inclusive education in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 6(2), 113–128.
Petrie, K., Devcich, J., & Fitzgerald, H. (2018). Working towards inclusive physical education in a primary school: ‘Some days I just don’t get it right’. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(4), 345–357.
Schinazi, V. R., Thrash, T., & Chebat, D. R. (2016).Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(1), 37–58.
Strømstad, M. (2003). They believe that they participate …but: Democracy and inclusion in Norwegian schools. In J. Allan (Ed.), Inclusion, participation and democracy: What is the purpose? (pp. 33-47). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school. London: Routledge.
Tsymbal, K.A. (2010). Deaf space and the visual world – buildings that speak: An elementary school for the deaf (Unpublished Master's thesis). University of Maryland, USA.
Tufvesson, C., & Tufvesson, J. (2009).The building process as a tool towards an all-inclusive school: A Swedish example focusing on children with defined concentration difficulties such as ADHD, Autism and Down's syndrome. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(1), 47– 66.
UNESCO. (2001). Dakar framework for action: Expanded commentary. Retrieved on 08-08-2017 from http://www.unesco.org/education/efa
Vislie, L. (2003). From integration to inclusion: Focusing global trends and changes in the Western European societies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(1), 17–35.
Walden, K. (2008). Architecture for the visually impaired: Design of a society for the blind (Unpublished Master's thesis). University of KwaZulu- Natal, Durban, South Africa
Wilkoff, W. L., & Abed, L.W. (1994). Practicing universal design: An interpretation of the ADA. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors
