Using Technology to Enhance the Performance of Intellectually Disabled Students: Mobile Game-based Urdu Learning
Abstract
Abstract Views: 428
The notion of using technology for learning is not new. However, the high level of digital exclusion of individuals with intellectual disabilities is well-documented. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the effect of two different pedagogies for students with intellectual disability (ID). The main objective was the comparison of assistive technology and the traditional teaching method for improving Urdu vocabulary. Using a quasi-experimental design, 8 ID students of 10 to 15 yearsof age were selected and divided into control and experimental groups. Their performance was measured before and after a six-week intervention program. The results showed that mobile-based technology improved the experimental group’s performance as compared to the control group. The technology had a positive impact on the learning of Urdu vocabulary by students with ID. The findings suggest that learning the Urdu language through game-based software/programs/utilities can improve students’ learning in the classroom. Teachers can use mobile phone as a learning tool to enhance their learning goals.
Downloads
References
Algahtani, F. (2017). Teaching Students with Intellectual Disabilities: Constructivism or Behaviorism? Educational Research and Reviews, 12(21), 1031−1035.https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3366
Amanulla, M. B.(2016). Teaching of Urdu: Problems and Prospects. Department of Arabic, Persian and Urdu, University of Madras, Chennai.
Amarin, N. Z., & Ghishan, R. I. (2013). Learning with technology from a constructivist point of view. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(1), 52−57.
Atanga, C., Jones, B. A., Krueger, L. E., & Lu, S. (2020). Teachers of students with learning disabilities: assistive technology knowledge, perceptions, interests, and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419864858
Awais, S., & Ameen, K. (2015). Information accessibility for students with disabilities:
An exploratory study of Pakistan. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 20(2), 103−115.
Baker, E. (2017). Apps, iPads, and literacy: Examining the feasibility of speech recognition in a first-grade classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.170
Biancarosa, G., & Griffiths, G. (2012). Technology Tools to Support Reading in the Digital Age. The Future of Children, 22(2), 139−160. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23317415
Boot, F. H., Dinsmore, J., Khasnabis, C., & MacLachlan, M. (2017). Intellectual disability and assistive technology: opening the GATE wider. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 10−14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00010
Borg, J., Lindström, A., Larsson, S. & Östergren, P-O. (2011a). The right to assistive technology: for whom, for what, and by whom? Disability & Society, 26(2), 151−167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.543862
Borg, J., Lindström, A., & Larsson, S. (2011b). Assistive technology in developing countries areview from the perspective of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 35(1), 20−29.https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364610389351
Brown, D., Standen, P., Saridaki, M., Shopland, N., Roinioti, E., Evett, L.,Grantham,S., & Smith, P. (2013). Engaging students with intellectual disabilities through games based learning and related technologies. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 573-582). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Cagiltay, K., Cakir, H., Karasu, N., Islim, O. F., & Cicek, F. (2019). Use of educational technology in special education: Perceptions of teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 189−205. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.21.6.2
Cerniglia, L., Cimino, S., & Ammaniti, M. (2021). What are the effects of screen time on emotion regulation and academic achievements? A three-wave longitudinal study on children from 4 to 8 years of age. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 19(2), 145−160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X20969846
Cohen, M., Hadley, M., & Frank, M. (2011). Young children, apps & iPad. US Department of Education Ready to Learn Program, 200, 5−10.
Cook, M., & Polgar, J., & Encarnação, P.(2020). Assistive technologies, Principle sand practice (5th ed.). Elsevier.
Durgungoz, F., & Durgungoz, A. (2021). Exploring the use of touch screen devices for children with special educational needs and disabilities: Digital vs traditional. European Journal of Special Education Research, 7(1), 92−109.https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v7i1.3612
Edyburn, D. L. (2007). Technology‐enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 146−152. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.1.7
Godwin, K. (2012). Use of Tablet Technology in the Classroom. NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation. Institute of Early Childhood Macquarie University.https://www.cirta.org/images/doc_archive/cirta_nouvelles/iPad_Evaluation_Sydney_Region.pdf
Higgins, E. L. & Raskind, M. H. (1999). Speaking to read: The effects of continuous vs. discrete speech recognition systems on the reading and spelling of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 19−30. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500102
Kim, Y. & Smith, D. (2017). Pedagogical and technological augmentation of mobile learning for young children interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(1), 4−16.
Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., Lahmar, J., & Scott, F. (2018). Play and creativity in young children’s use of apps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 879–882.
Marsh, J., Wood, E., Chesworth, L., Nisha, B., Nutbrown, B., & Olney, B. (2019). Makerspaces in early childhood education: Principles of pedagogy and practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(3), 221−233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1655651
Neumann, M.M., Neumann, D.L. (2014). Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education, 42, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0608-3
National University of Medical Sciences.(2019).https://numspak.edu.pk/
Papadakis, S. (2018). The use of computer games in classroom environment. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 9(1), 1−25. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2018.090191
Safdar, S., Khan, S. A., Azam, N., Mahmood, H., &Pervaiz, F. (2019). Need assessment of assistive technology in children with multiple disabilities. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 69(Suppl 2), 229−234.
Schalock, R. L., & Luckasson, R. (2004). American association on mental retardation's definition, classification, and system of supports and its relation to international trends and issues in the field of intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 1(3‐4), 136−146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2004.04028.x
Shuler, C. (2012). iLearn II: An Addendum An Analysis of the Games Category of Apple’s App Store. New York. http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/upload_kits/ilearnii.pdf.
Soares, N., Evans, T., & Patel, D. R. (2018).Specific learning disability in mathematics: A comprehensive review. Translational Pediatrics, 7(1),48−62.https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2017.08.03
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252−275.
Thompson, J. R., Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2016). Supports and support needs in strengths-based models of intellectual disability. In Handbook of research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 39-57). Routledge.
Terras, M. M., Boyle, E. A., Ramsay, J., & Jarrett, D. (2018). The opportunities and Challenges of serious games for people with an intellectual disability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(4), 690−700.
Warschauer, M. (2007). A teacher's place in the digital divide. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(2), 147−166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00118.x
Weston, M. E., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1: 1 laptop initiatives and educational change. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6), 1−26.
Yasir, T., Abid, A., & Shahzada, A. (2019, February). Development of Smart phone based Cultural Social Stories for Intellectually Disabled Children of Pakistan. In 2019 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Yeni, S., Cagiltay, K., & Karasu, N. (2019). Usability investigation of an educational mobile application for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(4), 1−14.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors
