TVET Trainers Understanding of Engaging Instruction: Supportive Learning Environment for Work Integrated Learning


Gouhar Pirzada


The purpose of this study is to explore TVET trainers’ understanding of engaging instruction with relevance to ensuring a supportive learning environment that could lead to effective work-integrated learning. Participants’ engagement in the training process that wholly prepares them for real-life work scenarios is always a challenging task for trainers. The existing gaps in theory and practice highlight the significance of the research study. Both the trainees and the trainers are usually not content with the learning environment and the final training outcomes to match their work requirements. This research identifies the trainer’s understanding of engaging instruction under three main themes: supportive learning environment, work-integrated learning, and expected competencies of trainers. Purposive sampling was used to collect data from 21 TVET trainers. All participants are actively working in TVET institutes. The qualitative data analysis technique is applied as a data collection strategy to explore participants' views, opinions, practices, challenges, preferences, and lived experiences. The data analysis revealed that most trainers believe training participants require a conducive environment to enrich their learning experiences. Most participants have also emphasised achieving the work-integrated learning outcomes by applying the KSA (Knowledge, Skills and Attitude) approach. The findings have been discussed from various perspectives, and some suggestions based on results have been put forward, including a further focus on appropriate training strategies.  

Keywords: Supportive learning environment, work-integrated learning, engaging instructions; trainers’ competencies, TVET



Ahmed, A., Wadood, A., & Mohammad, N. (2020). Tracer study of socio-economic and demographic impacts of technical and vocational education and training (tvet) for women in Baluchistan. Pakistan Social Scineces Review, 4(3), 824-838.
Ahmed, P. H. (2010). Building capacity of teachers and trainers in technical and vocational education and training (tvet) in sudan [Doctoral dessertation, Technical University of Dresden-Germany]. Technical University of Dresden-Germany.
Akhuemonkhan, I., Raimi, L., & Dada, J. O. (2014). Impact of quality assurance on technical vocational education and training in Nigeria. Afro Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 5(5), 1-25.
Alias, N. A., & Rahman, N. S. N. A. (2005). The supportive distance learning environment: A study on the learning support needs of Malaysian online learners. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning, 8(2).
Alenezi, A. (2012). Faculty members’ perception of e-learning in higher education in the Kingdom of ‎ Saudi Arabia‎‎(KSA)‎ [Doctoral dessertation, Texas Tech University]. Texas Tech University Liberaries.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Buchanan, J. (2012). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: A teacher-as-learner-centred approach. International Journal of Learning, 18(10), 345-356.
Cooper, L., Orrell, J., & Bowden, M. (2010). Work integrated learning: A guide to effective practice. Routledge.
Choi, W., & Jacobs, R. L. (2011). Influences of formal learning, personal learning orientation, and supportive learning environment on informal learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(3), 239-257.
Elvira, Q., Beausaert, S., Segers, M., Imants, J., & Dankbaar, B. (2016). Development and validation of a supportive learning environment for expertise development questionnaire (SLEED-Q). Learning Environments Research, 19(1), 17-41.
Ferns, S., Campbell, M., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2014). Work integrated learning. In S. Ferns (Ed.), Work integrated learning in the curriculum (pp. 1-6). HERDSA.
Houcine, B., & Zouheyr, G. (2019). estimating the economic returns of education in KSA by using mincerian earnings function. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(6), 94-99.
Hindman, J., Grant, L., & Stronge, J. (2013). Supportive learning environment, the: Effective teaching practices. Routledge.
Hodgson, D., May, S., & Marks‐Maran, D. (2008). Promoting the development of a supportive learning environment through action research from the ‘middle out’. Educational Action Research, 16(4), 531-544.
Harper, K., & Temkin, D. (2019). Responding to trauma through policies to create supportive learning environments. Child Trends.
Jackson, D. (2015). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 350-367.
Lancaster, S., & di Milia, L. (2015). Developing a supportive learning environment in a newly formed organisation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(6), 442-456.
Ilanlou, M., & Zand, M. (2011). Professional competencies of teachers and the qualitative evaluation. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1143-1150.
Martin, A., & Hughes, H. (2011). How to make the most of work integrated learning: A Guide for students, lecturers & supervisors. Ako Aotearoa.
Mtika, P., & Gates, P. (2010). Developing learner-centred education among secondary trainee teachers in Malawi: The dilemma of appropriation and application. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(4), 396-404.
Orrell, J. (2011). Good practice report: Work-Integrated learning. Strawberry Hills.
Orrell, J. (2004). Work-Integrated learning programmes: Management and educational quality (Paper presentation). In Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum (pp. 1-5). Victoria University.
Patrick, C. J., Peach, D., Pocknee, C., Webb, F., Fletcher, M., & Pretto, G. (2008). The WIL (Work Integrated Learning) report: A national scoping study. Queensland University of Technology.
Pirzada, G. (2020). Effect of including global TVET worldview in TIMT (TVET) (Institute Management Training) on vocational institute management in Pakistan. TVET@asia.
Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M., & Pilot, A. (2016). An activity‐based instructional framework for transforming authentic modeling practices into meaningful contexts for learning in science education. Science Education, 100(6), 1092-1123.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595.
Selvi, K. (2010). Teachers’ competencies. Cultura International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 7(1), 167-175.
Smith, C. (2012). Evaluating the quality of work-integrated learning curricula: A comprehensive framework. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 247-262.
Smith, M., Brooks, S., Lichtenberg, A., McIlveen, P., Torjul, P., & Tyler, J. (2009). Career development learning: Maximising the contribution of work-integrated learning to the student experience. (Final project report). University of Southern Queensland.
Shabbir, M. S. (2009, November). Supportive learning environment-A basic ingredient of learning organisation (Paper presentation). Proceedings 2nd CBRC, Lahore, Pakistan.
TVET. (2015). Pakistan technical & vocational education & training reforms. TVET.
Trede, F. (2012). Role of work-integrated learning in developing professionalism and professional identity. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 13(3), 159-167.
Thompson, N. E., & Wheeler, J. P. (2010). Learning environment: Creating and implementing a safe, supportive learning environment. Journal of Family Consumer Sciences Education, 26, 235-246.