Academic Reading and Writing Challenges Faced by Doctoral Students in Peshawar, Pakistan: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
The current qualitative study attempted to explore the perceptions of doctoral students in relation to the challenges and difficulties they faced during their research degrees. In recent years, substantial and rapid changes have been taking place in the higher educational sector of Pakistan. Most universities have started to place a premium on the enhancement and productivity of research in terms of the number of publications and PhD students’ production. Despite this shift towards a focus on research productivity, universities in general and private universities in particular have been finding it a daunting challenge to provide essential facilities in line with the research needs of students and faculty. The sample of the study comprised of 10 doctoral students, from 5 private sector universities in Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Pakistan. The sample was selected through purposive and convenient sampling techniques. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews and was analysed using thematic analysis. The current study contributed to the understanding pertaining to the issue in several ways: (1) This study enriched the current literature about writing and reading difficulties of Pakistani doctoral students, (2), The study highlighted loopholes in doctoral studies/courses/programs in Pakistan and identified areas that need revision and improvement to help and improve doctoral studies. The findings revealed several challenges faced by doctoral students. These challenges include academic reading and writing difficulties, lack of requisite computer software application knowledge and skills, problems in supervisors’ role, ill-equipped libraries, and outdated course work content. The study also carries important implications in terms of providing insights into the issues and challenges faced by PhD Education students in Pakistan.
Downloads
References
Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
Batool, S. H., Ali, A. F., & Safdar, M. (2022). What Pakistani doctoral students want? A qualitative exploration of their research experiences. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(4/5), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2021-0074
Breen, R. L. (2006). A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(3), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260600927575
Buckingham, L. (2008). Development of English academic writing competence by Turkish scholars. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.28945/47
Cohen, N., & Arieli, T. (2011). Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311405698
Gardner, S. K. (2010). Faculty perspectives on doctoral student socialization in five disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.28945/1310
Gopee, N., & Deane, M. (2013). Strategies for successful academic writing—Institutional and non-institutional support for students. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1624–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004
Halai, N. (2011a). Developing researchers in education through a doctoral programme: A challenge in the context of Pakistan. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 19(2), 509–520.
Halai, N. (2011b). Evolution of doctoral education in Pakistan: Challenges and successes of doctoral students of education in a public sector university of Pakistan. Perspectives in Education, 29(3), 64–75.
Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. (2013). 2013-14. Annual report. https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/news/AnnualReports/Annual%20Report%202013-14.pdf
Huang, L.-S. (2010). Seeing Eye to eye? The academic writing needs of graduate and undergraduate students from students’ and instructors’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375372
Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049236
Khan, M. I., Majoka, M. I., & Fazal, S. (2016). Post/Graduate Academic Writing Problems: A Pakistan Case. In C Badenhorst, & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 389–406). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338_022
Langum, V., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2017). Writing academic English as a doctoral student in Sweden: Narrative perspectives. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.12.004
Luo, N., & Hyland, K. (2016). Chinese academics writing for publication: English teachers as text mediators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.005
Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Wiley Publishers.
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
Morton, J., Storch, N., & Thompson, C. (2015). What our students tell us: Perceptions of three multilingual students on their academic writing in first year. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.007
Murtaza, K. G., & Hui, L. (2021). Higher education in Pakistan: Challenges, opportunities, suggestions. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(2), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.211
Olsson, A., & Sheridan, V. (2012). A case study of Swedish scholars’ experiences with and perceptions of the use of English in academic publishing. Written Communication, 29(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311428566
Phakiti, A., & Li, L. (2011). General academic difficulties and reading and writing difficulties among Asian ESL postgraduate students in TESOL at an Australian University. RELC Journal, 42(3), 227–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211421417
Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. ISRN Education, 2012, Article e934941. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941
Saldana, J. (2009). The coding for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.
Shah, S. (2010, December 6–8). Higher education expansion in Pakistan and issues of quality (Paper presentation). 3rd International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education. Lahore, Pakistan.
Suliman, W. A., & Tadros, A. (2011). Nursing students coping with English as a foreign language medium of instruction. Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.07.014
Waters, J. (2015). Snowball sampling: A cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.953316
Watkins, D. C. (2017). Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis: The “RADaR” technique for applied research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917712131
Zhao, J. (2017). Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers. Ampersand, 4, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.07.001
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors
