Best Practices for Promoting Teachers’ Professional Development in Malaysia

  • Mohamad Johdi Salleh International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)
  • Muhammad Hatta University of Acheh, Indonesia
Keywords: cluster schools in Malaysia, principals’ best practice, teacher professionalism

Abstract

Abstract Views: 428

Cluster schools in Malaysia were formed to employ best teachers to achieve educational outcomes corresponding to the 4th industrial revolution (IR). This study examines the best practices of promoting teachers’ professional development prevalent among principals of cluster secondary schools in Malaysia. The Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS) was used as the data collection instrument. A diverse sample of 871 respondents belonging to both genders, different ethnicities and types of schools, and having various designations at schools was drawn randomly using cluster sampling. The researcher employed descriptive statistical procedures involving frequency count and percentage distribution as the means to analyze the collected data. The use of such data is a standard practice in Malaysia which is employed to plan professional development among principals of cluster secondary schools. The study indicated that the best practice of developing teacher professionalism among principals of cluster secondary schools in Malaysia according to principals’ and teachers’ perceptions was ‘setting aside time at faculty meetings for teachers to share ideas about instruction or information from in-service activities.’ The findings will effectively assist the process of promoting a positive school learning climate among the principals and teachers of secondary schools in Malaysia in the wake of meeting the goals of National Philosophy of Education, Vision 2020 and the aspirations of the Malaysia Education Development Plan 2013-2025 in the era of IR 4. Other school principals may use the outcomes of this research to facilitate and improve students’ academic performance in their respective schools and join hands in the collective effort of raising the work force capable of meeting national goals at par with international standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, D., Devadason, E., Periasamy, R., & Lee, K. C. S. (2018). Instructional Leadership: Placing Learning to the Fore. Instructional Leadership to the Fore: Research and Evidence, 1, 1-12.

Ahamad, Z., & Kasim, A. L. (2016). Organizational Climate as an editor of the relationship between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Behavior in school. International Journal of Scientific Research and Education, 4(4), 5168-5176.

Alatlı, B., & Pehlivan, E. B. (2014). Classification of Countries Participated in TALIS. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2262-2265.

Allen, N., Grigsby, B., & Peters, M. L. (2015). Does leadership matter? Examining the relationship among transformational leadership, school climate, and student achievement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 10(2), 1-22.

Bear, G. G., Yang, C., & Pasipanodya, E. (2015). Assessing school climate validation of a brief measure of the perceptions of parents. Journal of Psych Educational Assessment, 33(2), 115-129.

Blasé, J. & Blasé, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers perspective on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130-141.

Buske, R. (2018). The principal as a key actor in promoting teachers’ innovativeness–analyzing the innovativeness of teaching staff with variance-based partial least square modeling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(2), 262-284.

Danielson, L., Doolittle, J., & Bradley, R. (2007). Professional development, capacity building, and research needs: Critical issues for response to intervention implementation. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 632.

Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258.

Depolo, M., & Vignoli, M. (2019). Accompanying organizational innovation by research: The case for performance evaluation of Italian school principals. Psychologica, 62(1), 131-142.

Fancera, S. F. (2019). School leadership for professional development: the role of social media and networks. Professional Development in Education, 1-13.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2017). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Thousands, Oaks: Corwin Press.

Hairuddin, M.A. (2016). The strategic leadership fundamentals for schools (IIUM Press Series of Text Book-3, p. 418-435). Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Press.

Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239.

Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1987). Assessing and developing principal instructional leadership. Educational Leadership, 45(1), 54-61.

Hallinger, P., Wang, W.-C., Chen, C.-W., & Liare, D. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. New York: Springer.

Hallinger, P., Adams, D., Harris, A., & Suzette Jones, M. (2018). Review of conceptual models and methodologies in research on principal instructional leadership in Malaysia: A case of knowledge construction in a developing society. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(1), 104-126.

Harris, A., Jones, M., Adams, D., & Cheah, K. (2019). Instructional leadership in Malaysia: A review of the contemporary literature. School Leadership & Management, 39(1), 76-95.

Harris, A., Jones, M., Cheah, K. S. L., Devadason, E., & Adams, D. (2017). Exploring principals’ instructional leadership practices in Malaysia: insights and implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 207-221.

Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (2006). Instructional leadership: A research-based guide to learning in schools. New York: Pearson Education.

Jarvis, A. (2018). 10 Instructional or distributed leadership? Comparing two approaches to the improvement of learning in schools. Mastering Theories of Educational Leadership and Management.

McCarley, T. A., Peters, M. L., & Decman, J. M. (2016). Transformational leadership related to school climate a multi-level analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(2), 322-342.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Malaysian education development plan 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Author.

Nair, V. J., & Jain, J. (2015). Inhibitive factors that led to the underperformance of a student when learning the zone system. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education, 5(1).

Noman, M., Awang, R. H., & Shaik, S. A. (2018). Contextual leadership practices: The case of a successful school principal in Malaysia.

Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 474-490.

Okorji, P. N., Igbokwe, I. C., & Ezeugbor, C. O. (2016). Relationship between school climate and principals' job performance in secondary schools. European Scientific Journal, 12(4), 55-71.

O'Malley, M., Voight, A., Renshaw, T. L., & Eklund, K. (2015). School climate, family structure, and academic achievement: A study of moderation effects. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(1), 142-166.

Rashdi, N., & Khamis, M. K. (2018). Instructional leadership perspective of private schools’ mission definition. E-Academia Journal, 6(2), 33-57.

Ryan, J. (2016). Strategic activism, educational leadership and social justice. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(1), 87-100.

Salleh, M. J. (2014). Best practice of framing and communicating school goals among principals of cluster secondary schools towards realization of Malaysian education blueprint 2013-2025. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 1(6), 458-466.

Salleh, M. J., & Hatta, M. (2010). Relationship between principals’ instructional leadership practices and students’ academic achievement of secondary school in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(2) 77-91.

Salleh, S., & Aziz, A. (2012). Teaching practices among secondary school teachers in Malaysia. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 47(14), 63-67.

Salleh, M., J & Saidova, P. (2013). Best practice of transformational leadership among multi-ethnic head teachers of primary schools, Malaysia. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(3), 01-09.

Salleh, M. J., & Karnaen, A. (2017). Hierarchy of 7m-Teacher-Leader from Islamic perspectives. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 4, 157-195.

Salleh, M. J., & Hatta, M. (2018). Best practices of promoting a positive school learning climate among principals of cluster secondary schools towards realization of education blueprint 2013-2025 Malaysia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(8), 66-79.

Salleh, M. J., & Khalid, R. (2018). Effectiveness of Principals exemplary leadership practiced on school achievements: Stakeholders’ perceptions. European Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 208-220.

Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22(1), 73-91.

Tajasom, A., & Ariffin, Z. A. (2011). Principals' leadership style and school climate: Teachers' perspectives from Malaysia. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 7(4), 314-333.

Velarde, J. (2017). Instructional leadership practices in international schools in Malaysia: A case study. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership, 1(1), 90-117.

Wang, D., Wang, J., Li, H., & Li, L. (2017). School context and instructional capacity: A comparative study of professional learning communities in rural and urban schools in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 1-9.

Published
2019-12-26
How to Cite
Mohamad Johdi Salleh, & Muhammad Hatta. (2019). Best Practices for Promoting Teachers’ Professional Development in Malaysia. UMT Education Review, 2(2), 01-26. https://doi.org/10.32350/uer.22.01
Section
Articles