Challenges in Early Childhood Care & Education (ECCE) in public sector schools of South Punjab: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
Despite ECCE serving as a main support for children’s development, its application in public schools in South Punjab did not work very well due to various issues. The study conducted qualitative research into the delivery barriers of ECCE programs through the feedback of 14 educators and administrators from six districts. Findings revealed three critical issues: (1) Long delays in how policies were carried out, (2) A lack of trained teachers in early childhood education, and (3) Difficulties for parents to be involved because of their low economic status. The research suggested that to overcome these problems, integrated approaches, for example, community-based information campaigns and teacher training at the local level, should be applied. Nonetheless, the fact that the data was applied only to a selected region, and had a small size suggested the need to conduct studies in other underserved parts of the country. The study ended by recommending several policies that could improve both how accessible and high-quality ECCE was in South Punjab. Open-ended qualitative Google surveys collected responses from 14 respondents, public sector teachers and Assistant Education Officers (AEOs) who were working for ECCE in South Punjab. The findings indicated that a lack of proper policy implementation, resource scarcity, and poor teacher training were the major challenges for them. Supporting early learning required community as well as school-based action, yet poor parental involvement with socioeconomic gaps made educational outcomes difficult to achieve. The study further outlined the effective strategies that would assist in responding to such diversified development needs of younger learners, and it called for a focused intervention. The collaboration of governmental agencies, schools, and families was underlined as one strategy to enhance ECCE practices. As systematic gaps were revealed by this study, a contribution was made to the continuous debate on how early childhood education could be improved in disadvantaged regions.
Downloads
References
Ansari, A., Fasih, T., & Humphry, E. (2024). Ten years of early childhood Education (ECE) in Punjab (Pakistan): What have we learned? Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 38(sup1), S161–S179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2023.2281573
Attanasio, O., Cattan, S., & Meghir, C. (2022). Early childhood development, human capital, and poverty. Predicting mid-life capital formation with pre-school delay of gratification and life-course measures of self-regulation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 179, 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-092821-053234
Björklund, A., & Jäntti, M. (2009). Intergenerational income mobility and the role of family background. In B. Nolan, W. Salverda, & T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), Oxford handbook of economic inequality (pp. 491–521). Oxford University Press.
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Bowles, S., Gintis, H., & Osborne, M. (2001). The determinants of earnings: A behavioral approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1137–1176. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.4.1137
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). Developmental research, public policy, and the ecology of childhood. Child Development, 45(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127743
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
Clark, R., Hyde, J. S., Essex, M. J., & Klein, M. H. (1997). Length of maternity leave and quality of mother-infant interactions. Child Development, 68(2), 364–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131855
DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127
DiPrete, T. A., & Jennings, J. L. (2012). Social and behavioral skills and the gender gap in early educational achievement. Social Science Research, 41(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.09.001
Gertler, P., Heckman, J., Pinto, R., Zanolini, A., Vermeersch, C., Walker, S., Chang, S. M., & Grantham-McGregor, S. (2014). Labor market returns to an early childhood stimulation intervention in Jamaica. Science, 344(6187), 998–1001. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251178
Glass, N. (1999). Sure start: The development of an early intervention programme for young children in the United Kingdom. Children & Society, 13(4), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/CHI569
Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2052–2086. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2052
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/504455
Ishida, H., Muller, W., & Ridge, J. M. (1995). Class origin, class destination, and education: A cross-national study of ten industrial nations. American Journal of Sociology, 101(1), 145–193.
Kulic, N., Skopek, J., Triventi, M., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2019). Social background and children’s cognitive skills: The role of early childhood education and care in a cross-national perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022401
Leisman, G., Mualem, R., & Mughrabi, S. K. (2015). The neurological development of the child with the educational enrichment in mind. Psicología Educativa, 21(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2015.08.006
McEwen, C. A., & McEwen, B. S. (2017). Social structure, adversity, toxic stress, and intergenerational poverty: An early childhood model. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053252
Mischel, W., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 329–337. https://doi.org/doi/10.1037/h0029815
Nelson, C. A. (2000). Neural plasticity and human development: The role of early experience in sculpting memory systems. Developmental Science, 3(2), 115–136.
Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2024). Evaluation of challenges faced by the early childhood care and education due to the shortage of teachers in Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Childhood Literacy and Societal Issues, 3(2), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.71085/joclsi.03.02.50
Schlam, T. R., Wilson, N. L., Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Ayduk, O. (2013). Preschoolers’ delay of gratification predicts their body mass 30 years later. The Journal of Pediatrics, 162(1), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.049
Sharma, D. (2017). Impact of age on emotional intelligence and its components. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 1(1), 13–20.
Vinovskis, M. A. (2005). Historical changes and the American life course. In K. W. Schaie & G. H. Elder, Jr. (Eds.), Historical influences on lives & aging (pp. 1–20). Springer Publishing Company
Watts, T. W., Gandhi, J., Ibrahim, D. A., Masucci, M. D., & Raver, C. C. (2018). The Chicago school readiness project: Examining the long-term impacts of an early childhood intervention. PLOS ONE, 13(7), Article e0200144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200144
Wu, X., Li, X., & Miao, J. (2024). Early childhood development and social mobility in China. ECNU Review of Education, 7(4), 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241240479
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors
