Syzygy of Sexual Polarities: A Juginan Psychological Elucidation of Ode to Grecian Urn
Abstract
Abstract Views: 32
This study examines the psychological symbolism in Keatsian poetry using analytical psychology. John Keats ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’ is steeped in psychological, symbolic, and analytical perspectives, which are essential components of Jungian psychology/archetypal analysis. The current study aims to scrutinize the psychological and symbolic perspectives of Keats’s poem to understand the depth of psychic integration and archetypes in the text. This study analyzes ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’ by deploying Carl Jung’s concepts of syzygy or complementation of psychic energies of anima in the males and animus in the females. The term syzygy signifies a union of opposites like anima and animus and the conscious or collective unconscious. This process of complementation or complementary opposite of integration in the ode has symbolic interaction between the conscious male persona (animus) and the collective unconscious female persona (anima). Based on a close reading of the poem from a Jungian perspective, the current study provides a psychological understanding of poetic creation by underlying the conscious acts and thinking of the author as psychic interactions. This study aims to understand the symbolic representation of opposing psychic energies in Keatsian poetry. Moreover, the study analyzes the interpretation and the balance of male and female energies in Keats' poetry mean for the conscious and unconscious parts of the mind, and its effect on the poetic creativity and inner peace of the author. Thereby, the study elaborated that Keatsian poetry is a true depiction of Jungian psychology.
Downloads
References
Aske, M. (2005). Keats and hellenism: An essay. Cambridge University Press.
Barnard, J., & John, B. (1987). John Keats. Cambridge University Press.
Blades, J. (2002). John Keats. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bolen, J. S. (1989). Gods in everyman: A new psychology of men's lives and loves. Harper & Row Publishers.
Campbell, J. (2009). Pathways to Bliss: Mythology and Personal Transformation. New World Library
Campbell, J. (1988). The power of Myth. Doubleday.
Cantor, P. (1984). Creature and creator: Myth-Making and English romanticism. Cambridge University Press.
Dawson, T. (2008). Literary criticism and analytical psychology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521865999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521865999.014
Dobson, D. (2005). Archetypal literary theory in the postmodern era. Journal of Jungian Scholarly Studies, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29173/jjs91s DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/jjs91s
Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism. Princeton Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400866908
Jung, C. G. (2014). Two essays on analytical psychology. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725895
Jung, C. G. (1971). ‘The syzygy: Anima and animus’. In C. G. Jung, J. Campbell, R. F. C. Hull (Eds.), The portable jung. Penguin Books.
Jung, C. G. (1966). The spirit in man, art, and literature. Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426784
Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton University Press.
Keats, J. (2009). Keats’s poetry and prose. Norton.
Khan, I. U. (2021). Archetypes and creative imagination in ‘Ode to Psyche’: A jungian analysis. Linguistics, and Literature Review, 7(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.32350/llr.71.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/llr.71.05
Lawson, T. (2008) Carl Jung, darwin of the mind. Routledge.
Shah, S. Z. A., & Khattak, N. J. (2016). Oneiric reality of ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’: A jungian analysis. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 24(1), 71–82.
Ur Rehman, M., & Khattak, N. J. (2012). Wordsworth's poetry: Liberating readers from rigid personas. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(2), 91–98.
Wali, M. I. (2011) A midsummer night's dream: Shakespeare's syzygy of meaning. RoseDog Books.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
