Monoglot Ideologies in Multilingual Ecologies: Case Study of Language-in-Education Policies in India and Indonesia
Abstract
Abstract Views: 28
The creation of language policies is a socially embedded process that affects the socioeconomic well-being of those who live in a given language ecosystem. Unrealistic presumptions about a nation’s linguistic landscape on the part of its government run the risk of perpetuating an unequal social climate in which some demographic groups are given more possibilities for social mobility, while others are pushed into a marginalized position of powerlessness. In multilingual societies, the power structures that exist mirror the roles that various languages are given in social, educational, and other domains. The current study examines the ecology/practice of language in multilingual Indian and Indonesian contexts and strives to determine if it receives adequate reflection in the language policies (LPs) of both nations. To comprehend how multilingual social practice is managed and planned through official policy framing, it construes these situations as case studies. In social contexts where societal multilingualism is the norm, the current study takes a critically reflexive approach toward the formulation and application of policy. To determine whether there is a correlation between contentious LPs in multilingual situations and social justice, in terms of equal access to high-quality education, it links top-down government language management with local linguistic realities. Moreover, it draws its own conclusions regarding the implications of policy analysis for fair language management in multilingual contexts and teachers’ participation in policy implementation as part of their regular professional activities.
Downloads
References
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections of the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso Publishing.
Annamalai, E. (2013). India’s economic restructuring with English: Benefits versus costs. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.) Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 139-155). Routledge.
Cameron, D. (2006). Ideology and language. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687916
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford University Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2005). Reconstructing local knowledge, reconfiguring language studies. In S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611840
Coleman, H. (Ed.) (2011). Allocating resources for English: The case of Indonesia’s English medium international standard schools. In Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 87-112). The British Council.
Depdiknas. (2007). Pedoman Penjaminan Mutu Sekolah/Madrasah Bertaraf Internasional pada Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Depdiknas.
Durrani, M. (2012). Banishing colonial specters: Language ideology and education policy in Pakistan. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 27(1), 29–49.
Fernandes, L. (2000). Nationalizing the global: Media images, cultural politics and the middle class in India. Media, Culture & Society, 22(5), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022005005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022005005
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.) The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). University of Chicago Press.
Graddol, D. (2010). English next India: The future of English in India. British Council. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/english-next
Hadi, D. W., Supriyadi, T., & Yufridawati, S. (2007). Model SMA Bertaraf Internasional: Hasil Refleksi dari Penyelenggaraan yang Ada. Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Depdiknas. https://pustaka.kemdikbud.go.id/libdikbud/index.php?p=show_detail&id=31907
Haugen, E. (1973). The curse of Babel. In M. Bloomfield & E. Haugen (Eds.), Language as a human problem (pp. 33–43). W. W. Norton.
Hornberger, N. H. (2006). Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method, (pp. 24–41). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Hymes, D. (1992). Inequality in language: Taking for granted. Working papers in Educational Linguistics, 8(1), 1–30.
Jamshaid, S., & Naqvi, S. (2021). Impact of the language policy of English medium elite schools of Gujrat, Pakistan on the language practices of their students. UMT Education Review, 4(2), 43–73. https://doi.org/10.32350/uer.42.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/uer.42.03
Kemdiknas. (2009). Education statistics 2007-2008. Ministry of National Education, Indonesia
Kennedy, C. (1983). Language planning and language education. George Allen and Unwin.
Khan, I. U., Buckingham, L., & East, M. (2022). Multilingualism and English learning in Pakistan: Towards an effective multilingual policy. In L. Adinolfi, U. Bhattacharya & P. Phyak (Eds.), Multilingual education in South Asia (pp. 93–111). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003158660-6
Kompas. (2010). Konsep RSBI tak jelas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2010/11/06/03001614/.konsep.rsbi.tak.jelas
Kroll, L., & Miller, M. (2010). The World’s billionaires. Forbes www.forbes.com/lists/2010/10/billionaires-2010_The-WorldsBillionaires_CountryOfCitizen_12.html
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198290918.001.0001
Lamb, M., & Coleman, H. (2008). Literacy in English and the transformation of self and society in post-Soeharto Indonesia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb493.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/beb493.0
Mahboob, A. (2015). Identity management, language variation and English language textbooks: focus on Pakistan. In D. N. Djenar, A. Mahboob & Ken Cruickshank (Eds.), Language and identity across modes of communication. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513599.153
May, S. (2012). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832547
May, S. (2014). Justifying educational language rights. Review of Research in Education, 38(1), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X13506694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X13506694
McCarty, T. L. (2004). Dangerous difference: A critical-historical analysis of language education policies in the United States. In J. W. Tollefson & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Medium of instruction policies (pp. 71–93). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Meganathan, R. (2011). Language policy in education and the role of English in India: From librarylanguage to language of empowerment. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 57–86). The British Council.
Mohanty, A. K. (2006). Multilingualism of the unequals and predicaments of education inIndia: mother tongue or other tongue? In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas & M. E.Torres Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools: Language in education andglocalization (pp. 262–283). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598968-014
Norton, B. (2010). Language and identity. In N. H. Hornberger & S. L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 349–369). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692849-015
Pandey, G. (2011, February 15). An 'English goddess' for India's down-trodden. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-12355740
Pearson, P. (2014). Policy without a plan: English as a medium of instruction in Rwanda. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.857286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.857286
Pennycook, A. (2010). Nationalism, identity, and popular culture. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692849-005
Rao, S. S. (2008). India's language debates and Education of Linguistic Minorities. Economicand Political Weekly, 43(36), 63–69.
Ricento, T. (Ed.). (2006). Language policy: Theory and practice–An introduction. In T. Ricento (Eds.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 10–23). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. A., & Kroskrity, P. V. (Eds). (1998). Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford University Press.
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203387962
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2004, February). The right to mother tongue medium education-the hot potato in human rights instruments (Paper presentation). In Opening plenary at the 2nd Mercator International Symposium, Tarragona, Spain.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. (Ed.). (2001). Literacy and development: Ethnographic perspectives. Routledge.
The World Bank. (2005). In their own language: Education for all. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/374241468763515925/pdf/389060Language00of1Instruct01PUBLIC1.pdf
Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in thecommunity. Longman.
Tollefson, J. W., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Medium of instruction policies: Whichagenda? Whose agenda? Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609328
Tsui, A., & Tollefson, J. (2007) Language policy and the construction of national culturalidentity. In A. B. M. Tsui & J. W. Tollefson (Eds.), Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts (pp. 1–21). Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092034-1
Unite Nations Development Program. (2009, January 1). Human development report 2009: Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development. Palgrave Macmillan. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2009/
Woolard, K., & Schieffelin, B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors
