Environmental Sustainability and Health in Pakistan: A Long-term Evaluation of Policy Effectiveness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32350/ihr.61.03

Keywords:

environmental policy, fully modified ordinary least squares, health outcomes, Pakistan, PM2.5, time-series data, water quality

Abstract

Environmental degradation continues to be a significant public health issue in Pakistan. However, evidence linking the overall environmental policy performance with measurable health outcomes over time is still limited. Using annual time-series data covering the years 1995-2022, this study highlighted the long-run relationship between environmental conditions, selected policy-related indicators, and health outcomes in Pakistan. Four health outcomes variables comprising life expectancy, maternal mortality ratio, out-of-pocket health expenditure, and current health expenditure as percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) were analyzed. Key explanatory variables included (Particulate Matter) PM2.5 exposure, water productivity, unsafe drinking water, EPI (Environmental Performance Index), GDP per capita, government expenditure on education, and urbanization. The empirical strategy itself included descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, unit root testing using Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (PP) tests; multivariate estimation was based on Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS), which was checked for robustness using Robust Least Squares (RLS). The stationarity results indicated that the variables were mostly integrated of order one. This justified employing long-run modelling approaches. However, formal cointegration evidence is mixed; therefore, the coefficients are interpreted as long-run associations rather than causal effects. Environmental stressors, especially air pollution and unsafe drinking water, were found to be still closely associated with negative maternal health effects as well as long-term financial burden on households. Whereas, better environmental performance was also correlated with improvements in the socioeconomic conditions affecting health expenditure trends. Some coefficients were found to be counterintuitive, notably for unsafe drinking water and life expectancy. This indicated issues related to measurement constraints, multicollinearity, and the limits of small-sample national time-series studies. The study determined that there is a need of more stringent enforcement, monitoring, as well as greater integration of environmental policy with public health financing, urban planning, and water governance in Pakistan. These findings introduced nuance to the policy debate, by providing a more conservative and policy-relevant perspective on environment–health linkages in Pakistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
0

Author Biography

Jawad Khan, Xi'an Jiaotong University , China

He is affiliated with the School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

References

1. World Health Organization. WHO Global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. World Health Organization; 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228

2. World Health Organization. All for health, health for all: investment case 2025-2028. World Health Organization; 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240095403

3. Waheed A, Fischer TB, Kousar S, Khan MI. Disaster management and environmental policy integration in Pakistan—an evaluation with particular reference to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Plan. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(48):105700-105731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29310-1

4. Malik S. Strategies for improvement of air quality in Punjab province of Pakistan [doctoral dissertation]. Johns Hopkins University; 2025. https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/items/6264b78d-3625-4480-910d-b9b45682baf7

5. Halkos G, Argyropoulou G. Using environmental indicators in performance evaluation of sustainable development health goals. Ecol Econ. 2022;192:e107263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107263

6. Moyebi OD, Sannoh F, Fatmi Z, et al. State of gaseous air pollutants and resulting health effects in Karachi, Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195(2):e266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10787-1

7. Tharwani ZH, Bilal W, Khan HA, et al. Infant and child mortality in Pakistan and its determinants: a review. Inquiry. 2023;60:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580231167024

8. Khan N, Imran M, Shah KA, Saeed A, Haroon R, Kiani HS. Effects of prolongation of speech and syllable time speech on reduction of severity of stuttering in stuttering patients. Rehabil J. 2022;6(3):435-439. https://doi.org/10.52567/trj.v6i03.194

9. Borchert W, Grady ST, Chen J, et al. Air pollution and temperature: a systematic review of ubiquitous environmental exposures and sudden cardiac death. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2023;10(4):490-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-023-00414-7

10. Azam M, Uddin I, Saqib N. The determinants of life expectancy and environmental degradation in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL bounds test approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(1):2233-2246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22338-9

11. World Health Organization. Operational framework for monitoring social determinants of health equity. World Health Organization; 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240088320

12. World Health Organization. WHO Global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. World Health Organization; 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228

13. World Health Organization. Sustainable development goal indicator 3.9.1: mortality attributed to air pollution. World Health Organization; 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240099142

14. Botta E, Kozluk T. Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1177. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1787/90ab82e8-en

15. Richter S, Völker J, Borchardt D, Mohaupt V. The Water Framework Directive as an approach for integrated water resources management: results from the experiences in Germany on implementation, and future perspectives. Environ Earth Sci. 2013;69(2):719-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2399-7

16. Carone M, Dominici F, Sheppard L. In pursuit of evidence in air pollution epidemiology: the role of causally driven data science. Epidemiology. 2020;31(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001090

17. Abbas HS, Xu X, Sun C. The role of state capacity and socio-economic determinants on health quality and its access in Pakistan (1990-2019). Socioecon Plann Sci. 2022;83:e101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101109

18. Nasir N, Rehman F, Omair SF. Risk factors for bacterial infections in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: a case-control study. J Med Virol. 2021;93(7):4564-4569. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27000

19. Nadeem M, Anwar M, Adil S, et al. The association between water, sanitation, hygiene, and child underweight in Punjab, Pakistan: an application of population attributable fraction. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024;17:2475-2487. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S461986

20. Chaudhry M, Anwar A, Ahmed S, Shah M, Ullah S. Non-acceptance of low vision aids among patients presented to eye OPD in Poly Clinic Hospital Islamabad. Rehabil J. 2023;7(3):12-17. https://doi.org/10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.25

21. Mumtaz A, Rehman E, Rehman S, Hussain I. Impact of environmental degradation on human health: an assessment using multicriteria decision making. Front Public Health. 2022;9:e812743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.812743

22. Pega F, Veale JF. The case for the World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health to address gender identity. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(3):e58-e62. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302373

23. Pearson K. VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proc R Soc Lond. 1895;58(347-352):240-242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041

24. Wu J, Yu H, Cao N, et al. Ecological footprint analysis as a tool for advancing sustainable development goals (SDGs): evidence from China. Ecol Indic. 2025;176:e113653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113653

25. Harrison RW. Occasional economic papers III: the Reserve Bank research papers. N Z Econ Pap. 1977;11(1):159-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779957709543983

26. Atil L, Fellag H, Sipols AE, et al. Non-linear cointegration test, based on record counting statistic. Comput Econ. 2024;64(4):2205-2230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10520-1

27. Paradiso A. The dynamics of late adolescent happiness: political, economic, environmental, and social determinants. Appl Econ Lett. 2026:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2026.2622549

28. Olaluwoye OT, Lukman AF, Alrasheedi MA, et al. Robust estimation methods for addressing multicollinearity and outliers in beta regression models. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):e11649. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85553-7

29. Gujarati DN. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill; 1978.

30. Albab U. The influence of economic growth, exchange rates and trade openness on FDI in Indonesia. Ekopedia: Sci J Econom. 2025;1(4):2094-2103. https://doi.org/10.63822/hn37bd83

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

How to Cite

Khan, J., & Tara , N. (2026). Environmental Sustainability and Health in Pakistan: A Long-term Evaluation of Policy Effectiveness. International Health Review , 6(1), 34–63. https://doi.org/10.32350/ihr.61.03

Issue

Section

Original Article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.