Stakeholder Engagement in Upscaling of Digital Literacy Programmes in Public Primary Schools in Elgeyo Marakwet County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32350/uer.91.04Keywords:
digital literacy programme, competency-based curriculum, institutional management strategies, stakeholder engagement, primary education, KenyaAbstract
The current study examines how stakeholder involvement affects the upscaling of Digital Literacy Programmes (DLPs) in public primary schools in Elgeyo Marakwet county, Kenya. The use of the Competency Based Curriculum (CBC) and the introduction of digital technology in primary education has set a new learning direction in Kenya. This study is based on the theories of Administrative Management Theory (Fayol, 1916) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989). The study used a concurrent triangulation mixed method design. The accessible population consisted of 120,929 people, representing 345 public primary schools. These included the Board of Management (BOM) chairpersons, head teachers, teachers, learners, and Quality Assurance and Standards Officers (QASOs) in Elgeyo Marakwet county. A sample of 384 learners (Grades 6, 7, and 8), 307 teachers, 28 BOM chairpersons, and 28 head teachers were selected using Yamane’s (1967) formula. Purposive sampling was used to obtain all four QASOs. BOM chairpersons, head teachers, and QASOs were administered the semi-structured interview guides and teachers and learners were administered structured questionnaires. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data, while the quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Pearson’s correlation and hierarchical multiple regression) via SPSS (Version 23). The results showed that although the DLP policy and financing has improved, there are still challenges in teacher’s ICT acceptance and learner’s access to digital devices. The results also showed that the upscaling outcomes of DLP were statistically positive and significant. Further, they were positively predicted by stakeholder engagement (β = 0.125, p < 0.05, R² = 0.765). The findings offer the relevant evidence base for MIM to take necessary actions to overcome implementation gaps and enhance the governance of digital literacy.
Downloads
References
Abacioglu, C. S., Volman, M., & Fischer, A. H. (2020). Teachers’ multicultural attitudes and perspective taking abilities as factors in culturally responsive teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 736–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12328
Adinda, D., & Mohib, N. (2020). Teaching and instructional design approaches to enhance students’ self-directed learning in blended learning environments. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.005
Ansu-Mensah, P., Marfo, E. O., Awuah, L. S., & Amoako, K. O. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder engagement in Ghana’s mining sector: A case study of Newmont Ahafo mines. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6, Article e1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-020-00054-2
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.1969.10248754
Bejaković, P., & Mrnjavac, Ž. (2020). The importance of digital literacy on the labour market. Employee Relations, 42(4), 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2019-0274
Brunetti, F., Matt, D. T., Bonfanti, A., De Longhi, A., Pedrini, G., & Orzes, G. (2020). Digital transformation challenges: Strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 697–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0309
Choudhary, H. (2024). Fostering digital equity: Evaluating impact of digital literacy training on internet outcomes in rural marginalised communities in India. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 43(5), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2347327
Choudhary, H. (2025). From margins to mainstream: Paving the way to digital equity through digital literacy training programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 109, Article e102533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102533
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Eskerod, P. (2020). A stakeholder perspective: Origins and core concepts. In D. D. Bergh (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford Academics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.3
Fayol, H. (1916). Administration industrielle et générale [General and industrial management]. Dunod.
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), Article 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Goh, E., & Sigala, M. (2020). Integrating information and communication technologies (ICT) into classroom instruction: Teaching tips for hospitality educators from a diffusion of innovation approach. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 20(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2020.1740636
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323(5910), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167190
Gülbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49(4), 943–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.002
Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development. (2017). Basic education curriculum framework: Nurturing every learner’s potential. https://kicd.ac.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CURRICULUM-FRAMEWORK-FINAL-2017.pdf
Kozanoglu, D. C., & Abedin, B. (2021). Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: Conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(6), 1649–1672. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2020-0010
Mitchell, R. K., & Lee, J. H. (2019). Stakeholder identification and its importance in the value creating system of stakeholder work. In J. S. Harrison, J. B. Barney, R. E. Freeman, & R. A. Phillips (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of stakeholder theory (pp. 53–73). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316595060.004
Morara, G. N, Makworo, E. O., & Abuya, T. K. (2020). Ranking challenges facing digital literacy programme in primary schools in Kisii County, Kenya. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 9(5), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.829
Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. African Centre for Technology Studies.
Murithi, J., & Yoo, J. E. (2021). Teachers’ use of ICT in implementing the competency-based curriculum in Kenyan public primary schools. Innovation and Education, 3, Article e5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-021-00012-0
Nascimbeni, F., & Vosloo, S. (2019). Digital literacy for children: Exploring definitions and frameworks. UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/digital-literacy-children-exploring-definitions-and-frameworks
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ochieng, M. (2024). Enhancing digital transformation success in education through effective stakeholder engagement strategies (Publication No. 31557292). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Omboto, C. M., Kanga, A., & Njageh, A. R. K. (2022). Myth or reality: Digital Literacy Programme implementation in primary special schools in Nairobi, Kenya. European Journal of Education, 5(2), 51–66.
Quaicoe, J. S., & Pata, K. (2020). The digital literacy and digital activity of teachers as the elements of the digital divide between basic schools in Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4077–4095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10120-8
Raha, A., Hajdini, I., & Windsperger, J. (2021). A multilateral stakeholder salience approach: An extension of the stakeholder identification and salience framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 97, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.06.008
Rosenfeld, E., Hu, Q., Sheridan, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Connell, G. (2019). Preschoolers’ math and literacy learning from educational apps. Developmental Psychology, 55(6), 1331–1344. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000706
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Statti, A., & Torres, K. M. (2020). Digital literacy: The necessity of 21st century competencies. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1711434
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Viglia, G., Pera, R., & Bigné, E. (2018). The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms. Journal of Business Research, 89, 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.029
Wambua, E., Kisirkoi, F., Maithya, P., & Njathi, S. N. (2023). School administrators’ support for teachers’ training and maintenance of digital literacy devices in the implementation of the Digital Literacy Programme in public primary schools in Kitui County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 46–75. https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.1504
Watson, R., Smart, P., & Macdonald, E. K. (2018). Harnessing difference: A capability-based approach to stakeholder diversity in environmental innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12461
Wittmann, G. E., & Olivier, J. (2021). The use of blended learning to inculcate self-directed learning in teacher professional development programmes. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijtl.v16i2.4927
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
Yurtseven Avci, Z., O’Dwyer, L. M., & Lawson, J. (2020). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12394
Zhang, J. (2023). Digital literacy of EFL teachers: The role of contextual factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1153385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153385
Zhou, F., & Wu, Y. J. (2018). How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior: A two-way perspective on the leader–employee interaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2017-0181
Zimmer, W. K., & Matthews, S. D. (2022). A virtual coaching model of professional development to increase teachers’ digital learning competencies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, Article e103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103544
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
UER follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors
